Hoe complotpraktijk lijkt op complottheorie

As major drivers of panic measures and scientifically unfounded policies I mentioned earlier het afdekken van onverantwoord virologisch onderzoek en de angst voor onthulling van de Chinees-Amerikaanse samenwerking met betrekking tot biowapens oftewel biological warfare (BW). Een project dat achter de geopolitieke schermen in het diepste geheim plaatsvond en aan alle kanten richtlijnen schond: van veiligheidsmaatregelen tot internationale verdragen. Alles kon immers geregeld worden middels vrijstellingen, welwillendheid van toezichthouders en sluiproutes voor financiering met belastinggeld. Zo'n verstrengeling groeit organisch en is strikt genomen geen complot, geen vooropgezet plan. Maar de eruit voortvloeiende de praktijk is identiek. Als zoiets zou uitlekken, zou dat het Staatsbelang zwaar schaden.

It helps when you see that right-thinking allies also see some of the links in my speculative chain reaction, even if they don't put it in the same context. Especially for someone like Jan Bonte, my story is too hypothetical. A plausible narrative is not enough for them, they want to see scientific evidence. (Me too, but I also like to explore)

You might even wonder if this is still science. Different criteria apply here, different judgments can be made here.

Was there a motive? ✅

Was there an opportunity? ✅

Did they have the means? ✅

Is the alibi missing? ✅

Opportunity and Resources were unlimited. The alibi may lie in data and decision-making, the crucial elements of which are jealously kept under lock and key by all governments. That seems incriminating to me, but I am not a Public Prosecutor. We try to reconstruct the Motif by connecting the dots.

Note: even with four green ticks, it is still not proof. If the omerta is properly maintained and we keep an unreliable government that continues to hide information, then the judgment of any judge will depend purely on political affiliation and/or the case will be dismissed due to lack of evidence.

Ik heb gemerkt dat het onderwerp 'oversterfte' niet meer salonfähig is. Het mag niet meer genoemd, net als WEF en Putin. De gelederen sluiten zich, de lippen gaan stijver op elkaar. Degenen die niet precies weten hoe het zit, willen het ook niet weten. Het wachten is op iemand die 'inside info' en dossierkennis combineert met een geweten. Een zeldzame combinatie, zo is gebleken.

I would like to draw the attention of those who follow this topic to a tweet by Jan Bonte, who is reading up on biological warfare and making discoveries. I couldn't include that Tweet in my piece (from 1 day earlier), otherwise I would have done so. Maybe you've already read it, I left this article for a few days.

De Tweet gaat erover dat virologisch onderzoek al gauw in de hoek van de biologische oorlogvoering is te plaatsen. Ik ben er zelf van overtuigd dat dat heeft bijgedragen aan de paniekreflexen na het ontdekken van het 'foutje in Wuhan'.

"You will stop it. Whatever it takes". Heb ik teveel 24 gekeken?

For those who can't or don't want to visit Twitter, the text is also available in full below. And then I'll stop with this story for the time being.

Whatever it takes...

They really pulled out ALL the stops.

There was no lableak ❌
School closures stop the spread ❌
Hand washing is protective ❌
The vaccines are the only way ❌ out
It mainly goes through large droplets ❌
It comes from a pangolin ❌
Without measures, things would have gone ❌ very differently
Disinfecting hands is protective ❌
The curfew is not fun but necessary ❌
It comes from a raccoon dog ❌
The vaccines are safe and effective ❌
A 1.5-metre society stops the pandemic ❌
Without vaccination it would have been ❌ much worse

Is there actually anything they have NOT tried, aside from vaccine-competing and anti-drip theory methods?