Unheard of criticism by Maarten Keulemans – Part 3
Would you like a notification e-mail with each new article?
Reactions
Comments that are not related to the topic of discussion will be deleted. Always keep comments respectful and substantive.
6 Comments
Post a Comment
amnesty Anne Frank monkeypox bhakdi variegated fraud
ionization young people we can query life expectancy face masks Un Lawsuits
thrombosis safety pregnancy Bulgaria Deltavax factcheck
John long covid Repopulation privacy RKI deferred care
asmr censorship conspiracy theory effectiveness iq Excess mortality debate
rivm UK Baseline Burkhardt filosofie nocebo
alijst Parliamentary inquiry Badbatches IC OUR responsibility
narrative paradogma Vaccination readiness Measures norm mortality ivermectin
mdhaero manipulation society women research infection lableak
scientific integrity disinformation communication media vaccination excess mortality
statistics science science corruption aerosols CBS politics
Side effects hve Public health Wuhan Children Australia
Level Wynia praise Government information mediacracy Pfizer
NRC Fauci Post-Covid journalism opinion lockdowns
Germany foreign country Wob sociology placebo obfuscation
Gupta data ChatGPT cardiovascular vitaminD Mortality Monitor
forecast table PeterSweden Ukraine Koopmans Japan Causes
calculator Anti-VAX WOO VE Spike qaly
Many thanks again.
My wife would say: "that Anton is a winner!". I agree with that.
I am still amazed that Mr Keulemans has apparently never seen a graph in which several lines have been plotted, and which therefore has two different Y axes. Surely that cannot be true!
If you are going to use such 'arguments', you make yourself very implausible.
Thank you, Anton, for your neat refutation of everything Keulemans mentions. I also learned a lot from this article.
I still do not understand why Mr Keulenmans is being given a podium.
I think he said little to nothing meaningful. Yet people follow him, and he is seen as a celebrated journalist. How is this possible? Who are those who hold him in such high esteem? I really don't understand it.
Best journalist of the Netherlands 2021. Can you check how the rest of the journalists are doing, they just take that.
I think Mr. Keulemans, given his woefully low journalistic level, is better off applying for a job at his local door-to-door newspaper. That would be a huge relief for a lot of people, de Volkskrant (perhaps the worst newspaper in the Netherlands) and especially himself.