Vaccinegate and the noisy cover-up, travel agency MinVWS, Tuschinski cancels Gideon

8 Comments

1. 

   Herman on 14/03/2022 at 11:36

   Emrani's twitter thread is misleading. He seems to think that 42000 vaccinations will lead to 1200 deaths. Instead of 42000 infections.

   Reply
   1. 

      Anton on 14/03/2022 at 12:04

      That's because there is no transparent data, I also tried to indicate that in the text. The total sample size is painted black. Your reaction is also incorrect: it is not about 42,000 infections. It concerns 42,000 reports of side effects. I understand the mistake, but you could also call the result 'misleading'. With incomplete data, it's easier to make a mistake than when you have the picture complete in your head.

      Reply
2. 

   jan van ruth on 14/03/2022 at 12:45

   On June 4, 2021, not everyone who had been vaccinated had been vaccinated twice.
   So that number of 150 million people is too low.

   Reply
   1. 

      Anton on 14/03/2022 at 13:19

      That's a good point. There are three weeks between the first and second shot. From mid-May to 4 June, this would involve ankle prickers. Jan-Feb-March-April-until mid-May are double jabs.

      According to Ourworldindata, 149.2 million Americans had had both shots as of June 4. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/people-fully-vaccinated-covid?time=2021-06-04
      It's close by anyway.

      Reply
3. 

   jan van ruth on 14/03/2022 at 13:51

   between the first and second shot is AT LEAST 3 weeks.
   And those figures from Ourworldindata?
   There is just no: "Presented to you by Pfizer" yet.....

   Reply
   1. 

      Anton on 14/03/2022 at 14:28

      CDC: "You should get your second shot as close to the recommended 3-week (Pfizer) or 4-week (Moderna) interval as possible. You should not get the second dose early."
      https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/second-shot.html

      How many people do you think it would make a difference, suppose you take 4 weeks?

      And if you know of a different/better source than Ourworldindata to compare the data, let me know!

      Reply
4. 

   Arnoud on 14/03/2022 at 20:41

   Dear Anton,

   Thanks for your piece again. I always read them with a lot of thanks, approval and afterwards newly gained insights.

   However, a request for 2 clarifications if possible:

   1) You write:

   " 4,471 deaths have been reported: 0.003% of the vaccinated. Previous VAERS underreporting turned out to be a factor of 40: then you come to 0.12%. Some say a factor of 100, but that applies to minor side effects. We can assume that these are reported relatively less often than serious conditions, because otherwise you end up with the unbelievably high 0.3%.

   The reality will be somewhere in between, maybe 0.5% or close to 1%...? That is also unbelievably high."

   Is it perhaps (where exactly?) in between or is it now above it? And where do you suddenly get that 0.5-1% from? What do you want to say with this?

   2) You write:

   "I sincerely hope that left-wing politicians will also get something like this off the ground, then they can show how it should be done. First they will have to solve how they can connect with each other despite the common far-right ideology that would actually have to cancel them. They simply do not want to proclaim the same thing as the extreme right. Big dilemma!"

   I can't make out what you mean by this (exactly). Can you please clarify that? Are they left-wing or extreme right-wing (because ideas imo determine someone's political signature)?

   In good faith & thank you in advance.

   Mvg,

   Arnoud

   Reply
   1. 

      Anton on 14/03/2022 at 20:58

      Hi Arnoud:
      1) You're absolutely right. It should of course be 0.05% and 0.1% (I have adjusted it). Sorry about that. They are just estimates, I look for a reasonable multiplication factor and then quickly arrive at quite high percentages, that was the message. Especially in light of the disease it is fighting.
      2) It bothers me that sensible work that comes from the corner of the FvD is disqualified because it comes from the FvD. When I look to the left, I see that they even have difficulty accepting facts when they have been brought to light by FvD. Everything is politicized and the left still doesn't seem to figure out how to deal with it. They have difficulty with their own views where they correspond to those of the right, even if they have nothing to do with political signature. Hopefully, the left will eventually dare to embrace (partly) the same 'truths' as the right – if they believe they are truths.

      1

      Reply