There is little more to add to the discourse. However, far too few people are aware of it. That's not possible because it takes a lot of time, if you want to keep track of everything. That's why I'm going to give you some viewing tips, which I think are important, from what I've seen. With short descriptions.
Four videos: expert witness statements from Prof. Dr. Phillip Buckhaults and Dr. Janci Lindsay, a speech by Dr. Peter McCullough and a lecture by Prof. Dr. Denis Rancourt. We know those last two names and the story they tell. Two or three years ago, people like Wolfgang Wodarg and Byram Bridle already knew where we were heading. This includes Andrew Wakefield, to mention that controversial name. (I only cherry pick those that I tried to draw attention to on this site at the time; I thought Michael Yeadon was too outspoken at the time.)
The cry for help is becoming increasingly louder and more polyphonic, and the 'reliable' channels are also reluctantly joining in. That Jan Grandjean from the Doctors Collective a place in De Telegraaf is an example of this. Although no 'NRC and Volkskrant' yet, they will eventually have to leave their bastion of lies. De Telegraaf shows how the media should act. It too narrative is given space So that the reader understands that there are two sides to the story. And perhaps it will be up to you to judge which of the two is spouting blatant nonsense.
If our MSM had already brought such balanced information in 2020, I would never have started this blog.
Ruud Coolen van Brakel: "Alle indianenverhalen over de risico’s van de vaccinaties zijn inmiddels uit en te na weerlegd. De zeer kleine risico’s op ernstige bijwerkingen vallen in het niet bij de voordelen van de bescherming tegen een ernstig verlopende Covid-19-besmetting. De vaccins zijn bewezen veilig voor zwangeren en hun ongeboren kind. En we zien inmiddels overal dat de oversterfte over de afgelopen drie jaar het laagst is in landen met de strengste maatregelen en de hoogste vaccinatiegraad. Het gegoochel met grafieken en getallen van mensen die tegen vaccinatie zijn, heeft inmiddels een bedroevend niveau gekregen. Van negatieve langetermijneffecten van de vaccins is nagenoeg niets gebleken; dat in tegenstelling tot die van Covid-19 zelf."
Well, if that doesn't convince then I don't know what will... But don't ask him for explanation because then he will fall back on his team members: "Vanuit het IVM werken we al 3,5 jaar met een vast team van apothekers en wetenschappers continu aan het verzamelen en verspreiden van correcte informatie, sinds kort ook gesteund door de artsen van C-support." The team members have each other to fall back on for the substantiation. There is no such thing, experts point the finger at each other.
Independent scientific evidence against the vaccines is growing by the day. Some recent examples:
- More absenteeism after the vaccination,
- Higher mortality in control group of Pfizer trials (not new by the way, also found by others before),
- The effect of DNA pollution (as found in the mRNA vaccines),
- a new study by Geert VandenBossche on infections caused by SARS-CoV-2 variants in highly C-19 vaccinated populations
- More about myocarditis caused by mRNA vaccines,
- Deaths per month from heart failure among men aged 10 to 49, from 2018 to 2022 (Japanese article, see chart below)
Deaths per month from heart failure among men aged 10 to 49, from 2018 to 2022 in Japan (also note the scale). The yellow line is 2021.
Research on citizens' initiatives
What is particularly striking now is that the stages on which these sounds sound look more and more official. For example, the title of McCullough's video is: "Peter McCullough getuigt voor EU-parlement over veiligheid vaccins". It may be in an EU building, but no, not in front of parliament. And 'testifying before the EU parliament' also sounds much more dignified than 'a speech in an EU building'. The video itself will be discussed later.
Zo ook de voordracht van Denis Rancourt. Ook weer een "Expert Testimony", nu voor "the National Citizens Inquiry, Ottawa." Nationale vlaggen alom en liefst anderhalf uur aandacht. Je zou zeggen: het dringt door, er kantelt iets! Maar ook hier staan bestuurders en autoriteiten er volledig buiten. Het ziet er wel heel officieel uit allemaal. Meer info over zijn verhaal volgt.
Fingers crossed that something will really come out of it because the Canadian NCI is an ad hoc citizens' initiative, comparable to our own BPOC2020, which always made me think of Juinen.
Am I downplaying our heroes? No, on the contrary, I blame the national media and governments for keeping prominent scientists completely out of the picture. In any case, abroad they are no longer exclusively with Alex Jones or in a vague podcast. The rooms are getting bigger, the audience wider. But the media, which are seen as reliable by the general public in our country, completely drops the ball. If they reported something that did not match the government's story, they would immediately no longer be a reliable medium. The upside down world. Until the majority of MSM start telling stories that fit together again, then they will automatically become 'reliable' again.
'Real' parliamentary investigation
Dr. Philip Buckhaults
In America they are taking a more decisive approach. The investigative committee of the Senate of Southern California (i.e. 'real' government) hears expert witnesses.
Dr. Buckhaults is an expert in the field of cancer and DNA. He sequenced the vaccines and found disturbing amounts of DNA in them. Approx. 200 billion pieces of DNA in each vaccine dose.
This DNA remained in the vaccines when they switched to cheaper production methods that were never checked. So that was after carefully produced vaccines had been approved. The product that was ultimately injected into the frightened people was never viewed or examined.
Buckhaults has pinned his professional hopes for cancer control on the mRNA platform. He therefore advocates that this carelessness be corrected so that he can continue. In addition, he sees in the sequences that an attempt has indeed been made to get the vaccines 'clean'. Then he can see the fragments and debris floating around in it. That was all there 'accidentally', so no one knows how much it varied per batch. The consequences of this DNA contamination for public health cannot yet be estimated.
The strength of his contribution is that, as an avid pro-mRNA/DNA scientist, he provides constructive criticism. He doesn't accuse anyone, although he puts a chain of government surveillance agencies on the bare ass. The good listener understands how disastrous his message is. He himself is not very explicit about this because it is not appreciated by those responsible. Just like his white coat, of course: maintaining the doctor's image. Well played. A stethoscope would have made an even bigger impression. Good cop.
The #WOB-Team created a subtitled summary
Jan Bonte just posted an informative tweet about this video.
Dr. Janci Lindsay
Dr. Janci Lindsay is the next expert witness to be heard. She complements Buckhaults: Bad copThis time. It turns out that much more junk has been found in the vaccines than just the DNA. Among the additives used, which were also found in the vaccine sequences, is the carcinogenic SV40.
Dr. Lindsay argues that SV40 is unnecessary as an adjuvant for this vaccine and has therefore been deliberately added. She cannot think of anything other than nefarious intentions. Take that with a grain of salt because at the beginning of her talk she also shows that well-known VAERS graph that compares years in which almost everyone was vaccinated with years in which only the standard program was implemented - in absolute numbers. Of course, you should first look at this in terms of damage per injection, not with annual totals. This is at the expense of the credibility of the entire testimony.
Startled scientists get carried away by their concerns, you can see that happening on both sides of the spectrum. There are very few who keep a cool head.
The nominations
Peter McCullough
MacCullough's video is worth the full 17 minutes, check it out! 👇
Denis Rancourt
Denis Rancourt's presentation lasts about an hour and a half... The scientist talks about his findings after conducting dozens of studies, including The last covers 180 pages. Good work, although I think we have made further progress with some analyses: for example, Herman Steigstra's model comes close to predicting excess mortality based on vaccination figures. I haven't seen Rancourt do that yet.
Well, who watches such a long video? Well, me. But that last report of 180 pages... I prefer to read a summary of that. Rebekah Barrett made that one. I have translated it and added or commented on it here and there. To follow soon.
Thank you very much! It is with great interest and admiration that I read all your information and feel a little less alone in the conviction that we are doing something for the children and grandchildren. In the meantime I see heads that are too small, usually a flattened piece of skull just below the crown, in the babies of pricked mothers whose percentage of hassle during pregnancy and childbirth has also increased enormously. And the imperative letters and advice to take the jab(s) just keep going. In January 2020, the Care and Coercion Act was "amended", a striking date and instead of preventing suffering for which this law is supposedly intended, it causes enormous suffering. Fortunately, there are people like you and that gives me hope that it will stop!
Dank u wel. Heel fijn om te horen dat u er iets aan heeft en dat u de moeite heeft genomen om mij dit te laten weten.
Hou vol!