Vaccin-innovator Carlton B. Brown heeft een 70 pagina's-tellende studie gepubliceerd en als open brief naar de regering van New Zealand gestuurd, onderbouwd met 604 referenties. Carlton C. Brown, wie is dat? Zijn LinkedIn- en ORCID-profielen belichten een relevante carrière in vaccin-innovatie. Ooit gaf hij deze WHO-post een Like. Geen geboren anti-vaxxer, zou je zeggen.
Pas aan het eind van het stuk staat iets over zijn expertise. Omdat niet iedereen bereid is inhoudelijk te lezen zonder iets over de 'credibility' van de auteur te weten, volgt hieronder een licht ingekorte versie van zijn CV. Al lezend kan de gedachte opkomen dat hij met zijn stuk probeert om het karretje van de concurrentie die hem voorbij lijkt te zijn gestreefd in de poep te rijden. Hij is tenslotte iemand die al tientallen jaren bezig is met de veiligheid van mRNA-vaccins en die is natuurlijk niet blij als een stel cowboys hem joelend voorbij stuift, triomfantelijk wapperend met de wetenschappelijke vlag waar hij zelf ook onder vaart.
Another point: he has been on side paths that seek out and perhaps cross the edges of science. I do not dare to judge that properly. Carlton is in any case a veterinarian (that should inspire confidence ;), biotech entrepreneur, vaccine innovator, hobby archaeologist and researcher, and also author of Discovering Ritual Meditation. Maar voor wie dat reden is om hem af te serveren: kijk naar de onderbouwing want als je zijn open brief inhoudelijk doorneemt en referenties erop na slaat dan is die kritiek moeilijk vol te houden. Dat wordt nog een kluif om te debunken...
Het is voor mij onmogelijk om alles te checken. Het gevaar is een soort wetenschappelijke "Died Suddenly": iets met missers erin waar critici blij van worden. Ik deel het stuk toch omdat ik er veel in herken van eerdere (ook mijn eigen) bevindingen en wat ik heb kunnen nakijken deugt.
Brown has a few biographies on author sites that are consistent and don't seem newly manufactured. And besides: I don't think my opinion is that important. Opening up a debate on this issue is what we as citizens have at least a right to. Hopefully his work will contribute to that. Because about an extra 50 deaths a day and governments and health authorities that do nothing but wring their hands until it passes, that is an unreal situation.
Brown covers in the piece of everything that went wrong, the whole story from GoF to measures to the PCR test to repeat punctures, bad batches and ADE/VAED, also ivermectin comes along. He dives into the raw data and identifies where the reports are incorrect, where approval processes must have gone wrong, how studies have been edited to obtain more desirable results, etc. etc. First read something about himself or jump directly to Study and Links.
Carlton B. Brown's vaccine career
Brown's career has largely been dominated by co-innovating vaccine solutions for zoonotic mutating RNA viruses that cause respiratory pandemics. He has used and worked on vaccines for more than 36 years.
This meant that he had expert development expertise and resources at his disposal from day one for all lead optimization, preclinical and clinical R&D and production process development. All with a view to laws and regulations in the UK, the US, the EU, Australia and China. I can't help but think that he had help from his network for this piece.
In that setting, he successfully developed a scalable synthetic universal pandemic influenza A vaccine until it was suitable for human proof-of-concept. He has also developed facilities that eventually broke the global monopoly for such studies.
As a veterinarian he is in favour of vaccination of animals and until SARS-CoV-2 he was also in favour of vaccination of animals. Brown is a global advocate of pre-pandemic flu vaccination with synthetic universal T-cell vaccines (since 2005), as well as purified and recombinant subunit vaccines against influenza-A pandemic threats. Vaccines make up the lion's share of his 36-year career (since 1986).
He was promoter and co-initiator of universal T-cell vaccines and immunotherapies (i.e. one vaccine for all virus strains and HLA subtypes/ethnicities, reducing antigenic imprinting) with benefits for zoonotic-mutation potential RNA viruses that can be deployed before or just after an outbreak of international importance. For this concept and vision, he raised £23 million from EU pharmaceutical and life science investors and built and led a vaccine company (2003-2012).
Still, Brown has vehemently opposed vaccination for mutation-sensitive coronaviruses using spike protein antigens (since 2004) given their 30-year legacy of antibody-dependent virus infection amplification (ADE) and vaccine-associated enhanced disease (VAED). He opposes vaccination with genetically modified spike protein antigens that bind to critical physiological receptors along the blood vessels and vital organs (i.e., heart, lungs, brain, kidneys, gonads and endocrine organs) knowing that they cause pathologies with 100% certainty.
Brown believes in the right to choose between using superior natural immunity induced by infection, and improperly tested and hastily approved harmful vaccination for a disease that is no worse than flu in people under the age of 70, and for which we already had effective treatments.
He has spoken out against rapid Blitzkrieg vaccination campaigns before predictable ADE consequences could be detected in monitoring. For a long time, he has been concerned about reverse transcription and genome integration, cancer and autoimmunity for any nucleic acid-based vaccine technology (i.e., any RNA or DNA vaccine, since 2002).
Carlton B. Brown also has rare research expertise in risk factors associated with zoonotic mutation-sensitive RNA viruses that cause respiratory pandemics (flu), coupled with environment-induced immunosuppression, directly and indirectly, due to solar and Earth magnetism.
The man is a bit crazy or genius. Or he does indeed have very knowledgeable resources. Judge for yourself.
Study and Links
Click on the three dots at the bottom right of the PDF viewer to download.
The study is also elsewhere as Word document download.
Copyright © Carlton B. Brown 2022. Document provided under CC-BY-SA 4.0 rules.
[3d-flip-book id="18599" ][/3d-flip-book]
His LinkedIn post: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/carlton-brown-13b66232_open-letter-evidentiary-document-sent-to-activity-7005690987574415360-JdDA
Excerpts from the piece: https://grandsolarminimum.com/articles-emails-activism/
LinkedIn profile: https://www.linkedin.com/in/carlton-brown-13b66232/
"Metabiota's Series-A lead investor was a Hunter Biden part-owned investment firm"
with which he has kicked the legs out of underneath even before the actual piece starts.
apparently he did not consider it opportune for someone to read the writing for publication critically .....
Look, that's what I mean, very good! Do you have a link?
I can't find anything about it, really only this rumble vid with 2 Likes...
Incidentally, it is only one of the many pillars, it is not all legs of the chair. But it makes sense to critically separate the wheat from the chaff in this piece. Such an extensive (too extensive?) piece is by definition behind, you can not keep updating because then it will never be finished. So good to keep track of!
link?
it's a literal quote from brown's writing to the new zealand pm.
Yes, I know. But do you mean that it's not right or do you think he shouldn't mention something like that because it makes him implausible? He explains on pages 63-64 how he arrives at that statement.
it does not matter who owns that business.
if that were the case, then it should also be mentioned who the other owners were, quod non.
so the mention of that one owner was apparently done on the basis of political motives.
Now I understand you. If you read it that way, you have a point. On pages 63-64 he makes it clear how the political mixing has played a role. But the explanation is not in the summary so does indeed come across as clumsy.