It is becoming increasingly difficult for the major media to keep the growing excess mortality under wraps. So far, that has worked wonderfully. Now that we are approaching the number of no less than 5,000 unexplained deaths in the Netherlands, something has to be done about it. Alarm bells are also sounded in other countries and Thierry Baudet has repeatedly drawn attention to it in the House of Representatives, in vain. The excess mortality that has been concealed so far was mentioned yesterday in the Volkskrant. The newspaper does not have to look for the cause because they already know it: all excess mortality is retroactively blamed on corona. Suddenly, according to the Volkskrant, "the number of people who die after a corona infection" appears to have increased rapidly. That is completely out of the blue; There are hardly any corona infections in this excess mortality.
First: how is excess mortality doing now?
Once again, we make grateful use of the graphs ofthe Eucalyptic Society
Chart 1 shows the situation over the last six months. The blue line shows the excess mortality after deducting the corona deaths reported by RIVM.
So this is excess mortality where there was no corona involved. The dotted line is the trend line. In July we were around 100 per week, now at about 400 per week with a provisional peak of 670 in week 45.
The total excess mortality in Graph 2 shows that only about 20% of the total excess mortality is explained by Covid.
Orange = Covid, Green = unexplained.
The orange line in Chart 3 cumulatively represents the number of unexplained excess deaths. The total number doubles approximately every two months.
This graph also shows when that growth started compared to the start of the vaccination campaign. However, simultaneity does not in itself prove causal relationship. Is that there or not?
Statistically confirmed correlation between vaccination coverage and excess mortality
De data die de vaccinaties zouden moeten vrijpleiten worden niet vrijgegeven door de overheid. Onze obscuur werkende 'wetenschappelijke' instituten weigeren het delen van de gevraagde informatie: "De data zouden maar kunnen leiden tot verkeerde interpretaties" en "Het is strijdig met de AVG, het gaat om medische gegevens". Dan blijven er alleen de dashboard- en CBS data over om mee te werken. Voer voor statistici.
In the Netherlands, a statistical publication is being prepared, in response to our "zomerdoden"-artikel. The correlation between vaccination and excess mortality raised there has, as it now appears, such a strong relationship that other causes can be pushed into the background. But that is getting ahead of ourselves.
In Germany, statisticians have regions with different vaccination rates. This shows that excess mortality rates increase as vaccination coverage increases.
However, that too is not conclusive evidence that the mortality is actually caused by the vaccinations. However, speculation in this direction is fed excessively because the government does not release data.
- There is still no openness about the causes of death in the second quarter
The causes of death could reveal relationships with the vaccine mechanism. The usual monthly reports have been abolished, the quarterly reports have been condensed to such an extent that no new information can be extracted from them. - The vaccination status of the deceased is kept secret
If we were to see a higher mortality rate among unvaccinated people, this would negate a negative relationship. Unfortunately, we don't get to see those figures. - Hospital figures with vaccination status are also withheld
From foreign data, we have to conclude what the vaccination status of hospital patients is probably in the Netherlands. If relatively few vaccinated people are admitted, it is less obvious to attribute the mortality to them. - No autopsies are made
Pathological examinations can be used to determine causes of death – much more precisely than a doctor who fills in a form on the spot. That too is not set in motion, let alone randomly.
There is such a cautious circumvention around that core information that the suspicion is increasingly focused on the vaccinations.
The fact that de Volkskrant believes that it can determine with certainty a cause of death for more than three-quarters of the deceased on the basis of two total figures, CBS/total mortality on the one hand and RIVM/Covid mortality on the other, is really too crazy for words.
The Propaganda Department is working overtime
So we still don't know why hundreds more people have been dying per week than usual for months, just as we don't understand that that fact has been swept under the rug. This was already noticeable in the summer, see the firstVirusvaria article about this dated 25 August. CBS en rivm kwamen afgelopen half jaar niet veel verder dan een incidenteel "Deze week was er meer sterfte dan normaal." En dat soms enkele weken achter elkaar, zonder oog voor de ramp die zich intussen voltrok.
De Volkskrant states that according to CBS, all these deceased people have died of Covid after all. However, this is not true. The CBS does not claim that anywhere, it only reports higher mortality rates. De Volkskrant manipulates those figures in order to speak with one voice, as agreed with the government, and thus increase the willingness to vaccinate.
Of course, the fact that there is more mortality does not automatically mean that it is corona. It is misleading to state that according to CBS, corona mortality is higher. De Volkskrant has already shown itself to be a propaganda magazine, but with this the newspaper crosses a line again.
Volkskrant accuses rivm
De Volkskrant may not fully realize that this disqualifies the RIVM. According to the newspaper, that institute would have missed more than three quarters (!) of the corona deaths. Remember that corona policy has been designed based on RIVM data for almost two years - to the full satisfaction of de Volkskrant, by the way.
Moreover, the accusation that the RIVM's covid mortality registration is flawed is easy to refute. I repeat below a graph from aprevious article, which clearly shows that the RIVM registrations (purple lines) and the CBS excess mortality (green line) are indeed synchronous - until mortality increases noticeably in March 2021. De Volkskrant does not provide an explanation for this sudden 'misregistration'.
It's time to take a stand
Possible causes of mortality were already tested weeks ago with the data available to us. All hypotheses put forward up to that point (including the most important: delayed care) have been calculated by theEucalyptic Society. The Society took a clear position at an early stage: only one candidate remains and that is the one for which data is kept secret: the vaccines.
In any case, there is no reason to attribute the entire excess mortality to Covid. De Volkskrant makes a desperate impression with this. They 'misquote' CBS.
There is every reason to scientifically excluded that the vaccinations have caused the mortality. The fact that this is not done does not bode well. After all, there are too many indicators pointing in that direction to keep ignoring it.
The straw that broke my bucket
Er is een FOIA-verzoek gedaan aan de FDA om alle documenten te overleggen met betrekking tot de goedkeuring van het Pfzer-vaccin "Comirnaty". Ook Amerikanen komen data tekort.
There is a period of 20 days for complying with such a request.
FDA: Federal Drug Administration (NL: Gezondheidsraad)
FDA asks court for extended term: 55 years instead of 20 days
However, the FDA says it cannot supply more than 500 pages per month. Because it concerns more than 300,000 pages, the last pages will be delivered in 2076. This exceeds the 20-day period, so permission from a federal judge is required.
The plaintiffs have protested against this postponement.
Protest plaintiff: 108 days is enough, just as long as before the approval
De eiser verzoekt inzage in de gegevens die door Pfizer aan de FDA zijn voorgelegd om het COVID-19-vaccin in licentie te geven en verzoekt om een gerechtelijk bevel aan de FDA om uiterlijk op 3 maart 2022 (dat is over 108 dagen) alle documenten te overleggen die beantwoorden aan dit FOIA-verzoek. Deze 108 dagen is dezelfde termijn die de FDA nodig had om de documenten te beoordelen voor de veel ingewikkelder taak van het licentiëren van Pfizer's Covid-19-vaccin (het "Pfizer-vaccin"). […]
It took the FDA exactly 108 days from when Pfizer began producing registrations for license on May 7, 2021, to when the product was licensed on August 23, 2021. We assume, as the FDA has stated, that there was an intense, robust, thorough, and complete review and analysis of those documents to ensure that the Pfizer vaccine was safe and effective for licensing. The FDA now has an equally important task of making those documents available to plaintiff in this case and the general public in at least the same time frame.
The FDA therefore approves a vaccine to be rolled out worldwide in less than 4 months. This is done on the basis of documents that take them 55 years to hand over.
How suspicious can you make yourself? Was that approval process sometimes incorrect...?
Serious falsification of the vaccine mortality hypothesis is evaded by obscuring data. Perhaps we should bluntly attribute the excess mortality to the vaccinations, until proven otherwise.
