Infant deaths in Scotland: incident or trend?

8 Comments

1. 

   P on 16/10/2022 at 11:46

   As for the safety of vaccinations in pregnant women, I recommend the following study. They have largely circumvented the survival bias here. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8427483/?report=reader#!po=30.5556

   It is safe, the researchers said. However, I would always look at the numbers myself

   2

   Reply
   1. 

      Herman on 16/10/2022 at 17:56

      That research in no way proves that vaccination is safe.
      They found no increased mortality if the vaccine had been given in the previous 28 days compared to a vaccine.

      Instead of doing the comparison right: rate of micarriage per vaccine status (0 to 5). That's the most obvious thing, they didn't. In other words, they participate in manipulation to make people think that it is safe. And just as long look for figures that can prove that.

      2

      Reply
   2. 

      Herman on 16/10/2022 at 18:03

      From that study:
      Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Lipkind reported serving on the Pfizer independent external data monitoring committee for the COVID-19 vaccine. Dr Naleway reported receiving research funding from Pfizer for an unrelated study. Dr Vesco reported receiving research funding from Pfizer for an unrelated study. No other disclosures were reported.

      The researchers previously worked for Pfizer, pfizer, pfizer.

      En dan de rol van de funding source:
      Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The CDC participated in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

      Compleet niet te vertrouwen dus.

      3

      Reply
   3. 

      P on 17/10/2022 at 09:21

      Ik heb het over de cijfers niet eens de opzet.
      The confidence interval (apparently 95% and two-tailed) runs from 0.99 to 1.17 in the 9-13 week group. That is just not significant on the question: do the odds ratios differ from each other (positive or negative). A huge red flag. When asked, vaccination increases the odds on miscarriage then this result is already significant. Effectively, they have found here a 97% (?) chance that vaccinating correlates with increased odds (in this group)

      1

      Reply
2. 

   Jelke on 16/10/2022 at 12:13

   Dr luke mclindon from Australia (I believe) talks about miscarriages and infertility, a bit in the same corner...
   https://rumble.com/v1hw09b-dr.-luke-mclindon-sounds-alarm-on-very-concerning-miscarriage-data-and-need.html

   3

   Reply
   1. 

      Anton on 16/10/2022 at 16:09

      Put it there

      1

      Reply
3. 

   Anco on 16/10/2022 at 13:31

   If you want to have a textbook example of "bias", this is one.

   With this conclusion, you also undermine any parenthood of the dead newborn babies. It will be your (dead) child.

   The only positive is that the fertile generation is less and less willing to take a vaccine, so hopefully these effects will also be short-lived. Unless, of course, the spike protein has caused long-term damage.

   The only problem is the government when it starts using 2G or 3G again to make travel possible.

   1

   Reply
4. 

   Anja on 20/10/2022 at 13:22

   https://youtu.be/wj4rE0LrpR0

   The number of deceased babies can be even higher.
   Because fraud is committed in the hospitals at the time of death!
   Stillbirth or neonatal death? That's the question!
   Stillborn or born alive? That's the big question.
   This is what Dr. John Campbell found out.
   See his video above. About the role of "Coroners". They do not want to involve the hospitals. Regarding registration and research into the cause of death: e.g. the vaccination(s) of the mothers.
   The coroner must also be included if it concerns a "neonatal" a newborn death: that is when baby has lived for a while after birth. A few minutes or a few days.
   There is a big difference with "stillbirth": when the baby is stillborn. Then the coroner doesn't have to come!
   That is done deliberately to keep deceased babies out of the statistics. Babies who are no longer viable due to vaccinations of their mothers.
   This is another great and horrific scandal.
   Fraud with data of deceased babies.

   1

   Reply