That's what it's starting to look like. On Tuesday, we already published a post in which we showed that there would be a huge "elixir of life" effect according to the figures in the Nivel article. The appendix with the calculations has since been removed from their website, but fortunately we have been able to secure a copy in time, in which the last valuable clues can be found.

Also available on Herman's linkedIn account

First, a brief overview of what we showed on Tuesday, based on the CBS figures:

This graph shows that excess mortality among the unvaccinated would suddenly rise at the time of vaccination. These are not the figures in the Nivel report, but the figures that Statistics Netherlands (CBS) on 23 February Presented. Therefore, this graph continues until the end of 2022, while Nivel does not go beyond 12 months after the first vaccination around April 2022. That is why we can now focus on the period from May 2022, when the overdue administration was also made up.

The figures used by Nivel came from approximately 400 GP practices, which together are representative of the average of all GPs. However, Nivel did use the same CIMS database, which means that the findings should in principle be the same.

These figures suggest a fatal and at the same time impossible side effect of the Corona vaccinations: they cause significant excess mortality among those who did not get vaccinated. However, this apparent increase in excess mortality among unvaccinated people can be explained by poor administration in CIMS. We have already posted several articles about this, including this one: Wanneer ben je gevaccineerd volgens CIMS? In short: there is an increasing backlog of up to 20% in CIMS, which has been documented and confirmed by the RIVM. This backlog could lead to vaccination registrations not being processed, for example if the patient had died in the meantime – i.e. as "unvaccinated". However, this backlog was not included in this graph, because we wanted to show what the consequences would be if you did not take it into account, such as the Nivel has done. It is therefore essential to inform how many vaccinated people have NOT ended up in the CIMS.

The missing figures

To our surprise, the appendix to the Nivel report (unfortunately no longer available for download) gives us the solution. We already knew the first backlog:

Thus, 7% of the people who were vaccinated did not consent to registration in CIMS. With the booster, it would have been 5%. The latter is not what the RIVM has communicated, but it is in accordance with our own analysis, but that is beside the point. And to be fair, we had not included this in our graph, but this has been taken into account in the new graph.

In the meantime, a memo from the LHV has also surfaced (thanks Leon1969). In this memo from On 21 June 2021, the LHV speaks out about her concerns about the growing backlog of registration in CIMS, which had risen to 38.02%. Also special is that the LHV reports that not 7% do not give consent ("opt-out") but even 11.75%. The RIVM reports in this memo that they expect 9%. So even on these basic figures, the various organizations do not agree. We're only working with that 7%, but we know that it's actually around 20% should be. This is now the same graph, but with this correction:

We can clearly see the difference in May 2021. The excess mortality among unvaccinated people is "only" 75% while without correction, in the previous graph, it was still above 100%. A small correction with big consequences.

But the second clue is much more interesting:

Here's what we want to know! It seems like an unimportant remark and perhaps even an unintended compliment to healthcare, but this is what it's all about. Realize for a moment what it says here. The general practitioners have their own information systems, in which they store the vaccinations of each patient themselves. In the CIMS, they can then find the vaccinations that have been carried out at the GGD. But apparently, 2.6% of these GP patients are missing from the CIMS registrations. That doesn't seem like much, but it's actually a lot, when you realize that the vaccination rate was 89% and therefore 11% unvaccinated. Those 11% are the people who are not in CIMS!

From May 2022 we will see it

In particular, we are now looking at the moment where Nivel stopped their analysis: May 2022. At that time, almost everyone had had the first jab in 2021 and so their analysis will end in 2022. We are now going to enlarge that period from May 2022. Unfortunately, CBS has only made their required data public until the end of 2022, but that's just enough as we'll see.

It is clear from this CBS figures also shows that 11% of deaths were unvaccinated after consulting CIMS. That would mean that it no longer mattered to your chances of dying whether you were vaccinated or not. We also saw this in the first graph from May 2022: the red and blue line coincide. So realize that Nivel only looked until 12 months after the first shot, so until May 2022! The part after May 2022 where the red and blue lines almost coincide has been disregarded, on purpose?

And what does this mean? First of all, we have to ask ourselves how reliable that 2.6% is. It is an investigation from the administration of the general practitioners. They had to catch up with their 63% deficit in the course of 2021. Apparently, 2.6% was left out. Perhaps there is still a part of them that has refused registration. Is that also representative of the backlog of the deceased? That is why, as a precautionary measure, we set this registration backlog at 1%. It can hardly be much less. If further research would show that it would still go towards that 2.6%, it would be easy to adjust that.

Now we also know how to correct the figures, starting from 1%. The 11% of unvaccinated deaths was therefore only 10% after correction and the vaccinated deaths therefore rise from 89% to 90%. And because of this seemingly small correction, excess mortality within the vaccinated group suddenly rises to around 10% and among the unvaccinated drops to around 0%. Normal mortality among the unvaccinated and 10% excess mortality among the vaccinated. This adjustment has already been incorporated in the last graph.

But now let's magnify this part:

Now it is becoming abundantly clear that the excess mortality is exclusively among the vaccinated. Without this correction, the risk of death for vaccinated and unvaccinated people would have been almost the same, after correction the excess mortality among unvaccinated people disappears.

But there is something else that is now becoming visible. On the right, we see two bumps in the vaccinated. The first bump appears when vaccination was carried out in October 2022. The second bump was influenza, which hit the vaccinated much harder than the unvaccinated. The excess mortality among the vaccinated was no less than 30%, among the unvaccinated only 10%. An indication that vaccination has also done something to our immune system?

What does Nivel actually say?

We have done the math a few times and can hardly believe our eyes. This graph shows the mortality expectation according to the (now withdrawn) report by Nivel. We had to adjust the scale quite a bit to get a picture of it:

Nivel comes with ten times the excess mortality within the unvaccinated group compared to the first wave and then also during the first six months in which everyone received the first shot. This explosive excess mortality in those months would therefore be among the people who did not receive any vaccination. We understand very well that Nivel is shocked by their own findings, this really can't be true. Maurice de Hond also paid attention to this and today a similar picture emerged: The Nivel study is even stranger than I thought.

Now, after the retraction of their research (the article in question with firm conclusions is surprisingly still there) we are curious to see whether Nivel can come to the same conclusions after substantial adjustments. You could still disagree about the middle part (i.e. until May 2022), where the administration of vaccinations has played a dominant role. Was there really an elixir of life and do you really believe in it? The degree of (dis)belief also depends on confidence in the correctness of the backlog figures that the RIVM itself also provides. There can hardly be any misunderstanding about mortality from May 2022 onwards. After all, these are the official CBS figures, supplemented by the percentage of missing vaccinations in CIMS according to the Nivel report. In other words, excess mortality among the vaccinated. We can't make anything else out of it!