If you want to see the historical decline of science with your own eyes, you can check out Peter McCullough's substack: https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/breaking-springer-nature-cureus-journal
From Corona-critical study does not pass the inquisition of the new Science™ church.
McCullough writes on his Substack, among other things:
BREAKING – Springer Nature Cureus Journal of Medical Science Violates Publication Ethics Committee (COPE) Guidelines
Publisher withdraws valid, high-quality and widely read Cureus publication calling for a halt to COVID-19 vaccination
24 FEB 2024
By Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH
In a stunning act of scientific censorship, a little-known publication contributor Tim Kersjes has retracted a manuscript written by epidemiologist M. Nathanield Mead, MSc, after the article attracted worldwide attention on the Springer Nature Cureus platform with record views/reads/downloads. The article called for stopping mass vaccination against COVID-19 based on a valid evaluation of the evidence. It achieved >330,000 views/reads/downloads in a month compared to an average paper promoted by Cureus that only achieves ~2700 in a year.
Een beoordeling van >9.2 wordt beschouwd als “uitstekend” en “baanbrekend”, wat dit uitgebreid geciteerde artikel met 293 referenties (gemiddeld artikel heeft er 30) goed karakteriseert.
The defence is also fully stated in the Substack post. Whoever the Previous article about this retraction I already know more or less what it says, although of course much more extensive and with references. An argument that deserves a substantiated rebuttal, but that is of course not the intention of a retraction. The answer the authors received (apparently immediately):
Springer Nature Research Integrity Support
Fri, 23 Feb, 15:17
to kdh, seneff, russ.wolfinger, jessicarose1974, stk, me, mead33~
Dear authors,
Thank you for your letter. Your rebuttal has been shared with the editors-in-chief of Cureus, who have confirmed that the journal will proceed with the retraction of the article. The notice of revocation will indicate your disagreement with the revocation as follows:
"The editors-in-chief have retracted this article. After publication, concerns have been raised about a number of claims made in this article. After further review, the editors-in-chief found that the conclusions of this narrative review are considered unreliable due to concerns about the validity of some of the cited references supporting the conclusions and misrepresentation of the cited references and available data.
The authors do not agree with this retraction."
The journal will publish the withdrawal as soon as possible.
Sincerely,
Tim Kersjes,
Head of Integrity Investigation, Resolutions.
Springer Nature Research Integrity Group.
If there is no response from the scientific community, it is clear: science as we have known it is dead.
And the fraudulent "The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2" will then simply stand:
https://www.nature.com/articles/S41591-020-0820-9
It is disgraceful that McCullough's study is being removed without a proper word and rebuttal.
We have Marion Koopmans and Ab Osterhaus, Belgium has Pierre van Damme. And they are, if possible, even a bit worse than the "NL experts".
Vaccines were 100% safe and effective, he said in 2021. He has to come back from that now. And of course, that doesn't go down well...
https://www.redactie24.be/coronavirus/onthulling-over-coronavaccins-dit-zijn-de-voornaamste-bijwerkingen-164572
Pierre van Damme also claimed in 2021 that the 3rd vaccine (booster) would give immunity for years(!).
Following on from this, check out this short video from yesterday with cardiologist Peter McCullough: https://youtu.be/5LrI560-LuQ?si=XyLqOQYDqb4FxDne
In it, it explains the biggest failure ever and of the vaccinated patients, 7% have serious side effects. He calls it another "debacle".
I'd rather say crime.
The Belgian vaccinologist Pierre van Damme is now also quoted in the Dutch media. Article is behind paywall. https://www.ad.nl/gezond/grootste-studie-ooit-naar-coronavaccins-onthult-vier-ernstige-en-zeldzame-bijwerkingen~a87eeb2a/
It does indeed say 'retracted' on the site. But... is still available for download. If there is no substantive comment to be made, then it's over and done with. Everything about the mRNAs is wrong (as a massive application for a relatively harmless respiratory virus) and has now been proven. It doesn't work, the trials have been carried out with 'vaccines' that differ substantially from the stuff that was eventually rolled out (mass production). The SAEs outweigh the benefits (because there aren't actually any).
I do see some more medics coming out of the closet very carefully. But there are still people in the Netherlands who argue for compulsory vaccination. Wonder if they have any idea how these injections do their job (read the report).
In the video below, a doctor comes to an understanding and she reads from the Nathaniel Mead report. She has unpacked a number of essential points. You must have seen it. She puts on the penitential robe and admits that she has seen it wrong. Better late than never, you might say. Campbell and Malhotra also initially defended the narrative.
Some considerations: By thinking, being critical and drawing my own conclusions, I decided not to take a Covid vaccination in March 2021. A well-founded decision. The 'vaccines' were mRNA based, and in record time they had received emergency approval. The RIVM models were absurd and we were manipulated. And, as an American colleague said: 'you can't unring the bell'. The fact that we had already had Covid in December 2020 made the decision even easier. How is it possible that doctors, who believe more in a healthy lifestyle than in medicine, have gone along with the narrative? The story 'with today's knowledge' is also bullshit. With the knowledge of the time, everyone could see that it was no good.
We don't need to talk about it anymore in terms of content. It's obvious. Can only hope that more doctors dare to speak out.
(https://robindeboer.substack.com/p/video-populaire-arts-en-influencer?publication_id=2043029&post_id=142094875&isFreemail=true&r=126uyo&open=false&utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email)
Either way, the report can't be hidden with all those downloads.