...or pay via paypal

cards

Reactions

Comments that are not related to the topic of discussion will be deleted. Always keep comments respectful and substantive.

18 Comments
  1. Chris

    Who wants a vaccine after all the lying and deceiving of governments and pharma? My prediction: mandatory vaccination... with the expanded WPG and WHO pandemic treaty, that's very likely.

    Reply
  2. DrDoom

    Very clear, top analysis, which also fits well with the mechanistic (delayed) action of injections with mRNA.

    Regarding accidental fall: it is very possible that in addition to the aforementioned causes, slowly accumulating damage to (small) blood vessels in the brain, especially the brain stem, lead to bleeding that causes people to fall, and then (acutely) die. Necropsy or CT scan can show/rule this out, but serological examination for the presence of Spike protein itself and/or antibodies to Spike protein and/or Nucleocapsid protein can also indicate at least a certain direction.

    Mechanistically, the body continues to produce mRNA Spike protein after injection with Pfizer or Moderna, which can also be detected in blood for months after injection. Because Spike protein binds to ACE2 that is found anywhere in the blood vessels, bleeding can basically occur throughout the body, in addition to immunological reactions and blood clotting.

    Modified mRNA and lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) containing modRNA can also be detected in almost all organs after injection: liver, heart, lungs, kidneys, brain, spleen, AND is expressed there in different cell types (1).

    If the modRNA is written in DNA, which has also been demonstrated in the vials themselves by means of contamination, and after injection built into a stem cell, egg cell or sperm cell, you will continue to produce Spike for life and the amount of cells that produce Spike protein can increase through cell division! Incidentally, Pfizer itself had already demonstrated this in Japan (2).

    It is almost certain that Spike protein is expressed in all organ systems, and that may explain why excess mortality has increased across all lines, as the injection does not remain locally in the muscle but spreads throughout the body. In addition, 10% of all injections are injected intravenously "by mistake", so that Spike LNP modRNA enters the bloodstream directly.

    It is therefore the case that people like Tijs vd Brink who only know "traditional" vaccines do not understand that you can also get complaints of side effects that are potentially fatal months after injection, AND why those responsible do not want this to be investigated, because if something has not been demonstrated / proven, legally less or nothing is possible.

    1. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168365922000414
    2. https://pandemictimeline.com/2021/05/japan-shares-biodistribution-study-of-pfizer-covid-19-vaccine/

    Reply
  3. Herman Aven

    The tricky thing can be the potentially cumulative causes. Multi-cause correlation with factors that can also influence each other. For example, poor mental health (such as high stress over developments) exacerbates the impact of a compromised immune system rather than being able to compensate for it. Similarly, three or more influences can coincide over a period of time and at some point become visible in the data, but without a good explanation of why it is at that moment and not before. Also, delay effects of an infection or vaccination if it would manifest in the form of change of recovery time or robustness. Only with another new factor will a vulnerability begin to manifest itself. These are not unusual scenarios. And I doubt the data will ever reveal its secret. Personally, I suspect that the immune system is a complex whole in which behavior, habits, exposure and mental state are an important part. Many if not all diseases and the concept of "well being" revolve around the immune system. Deep in the core, this has been massively and suddenly tinkered with: change in social behavior, vaccinations, hygiene, interaction, negativity or nervousness and so on. The puzzle will probably remain difficult without positive theory: a change in thinking about the coherence of many things.

    Reply
    1. Hans Verwaart

      Gives idd to think. Incidentally, CBS *** quietly reduced the number of road deaths in 2022 from 737 to 713. That is still quite a few more than in the period for Corona.

      Reply
  4. LN

    Perhaps it would be good – now that it is all starting to fade into the background at "the institutes" (CBS to 2-weekly update and RIVM can no longer report corona deaths) – to once again address how RIVM is covering up excess mortality:

    calculate those on the data of / with as baseline the average of the previous 5 years minus the flu waves, to better monitor flu, or in their own words:

    https://www.rivm.nl/monitoring-sterftecijfers-nederland
    "The purpose of monitoring mortality rates is to visualize the impact of an epidemic or an incident. Statistics Netherlands looks at the averages over the past few years for the week in question, which include increased mortality during the flu season. RIVM also wants to map excess mortality due to the flu every year. For this reason, the estimates of CBS and RIVM differ."

    Now Covid has become endemic and eig. has turned out to be a (new) type of flu, it is (certainly) not correct to calculate excess mortality from an epidemic on numbers that also include Covid mortality. Then – until those years have fallen out of the 5-year average, i.e. until 2026 – you will cloud that very impact. Do these statisticians not realize that, or do they? Or am I making a fallacy myself?

    Reply
    1. JVI

      No, you are not making a fallacy. If RIVM wants to visualize the impact of flu or future epidemics, all incidental factors must be omitted from mortality, not only flu waves but also the excess mortality of recent epidemics.

      But perhaps this is the tacit acknowledgement of the RIVM that the health of the population has structurally deteriorated due to the Covid-19 crisis and/or that the healthcare system has structurally deteriorated. In other words, there is no 'bounce back' to old levels; Current levels of mortality are largely permanent.

      Reply
  5. JVI

    In my opinion, there is another annoying calculation error in this piece. In 2022, the mortality rate will not be about 179000 but about 170000.

    I think there is a double counting: deaths from accidental falls, from traffic accidents and from suicide are parts of 'mortality from non-natural causes'. So you don't have to add those parts to the main category. That also initially went wrong for me yesterday when downloading the file.
    But if you correct this, the mortality totals of the causes of death also match the already known annual totals of mortality elsewhere.

    Reply
    1. Anton (@infopinie)

      We still expect confirmation from CBS, but given the addition, you can't help but be right. The article has been updated.
      Thanks for reporting!

      Reply
    2. Hans Verwaart

      And the confirmation is there. Not that I've had an email from CBS saying "sorry for the inconvenience", no I haven't. But in the recently published table in which the causes of death up to January 2023 were listed, it was now clear from the indication that there are three subcategories among the Non-Natural Causes of Death.
      5f has become 5e1,
      5g has become 5e2,
      5h has become 5e3,
      5i has become 5f.
      Thank you CBS for this clear way of communicating!

      Reply
  6. Michael Sirk

    Good morning Anton,
    You say in the piece that there is no significant increase in the number of deaths due to cardiovascular disease. However, I do see an increase.
    source: https://www.cbs.nl/-/media/_excel/2023/47/doodsoorzaken-2020-juli-2023.xlsx
    The number of deaths for cardiovascular disease has a seasonal effect and has a certain noise on the signal. However, if we simply take the annual totals (with this you filter out the seasonal effects and the noise) then we get;
    2015 39379
    2016 38647
    2017 38153
    2018 37795
    2019 37541
    2020 36622
    2021 37446
    2022 38986
    2023 39332*
    For 2023, I extrapolated the figures up to July for the total year.

    Reply
    1. LN

      I also noticed it last year: the sharper decline in 2020 and the trend reversal in 2021 and 2022 (and now also 2023). Personally, I think that the sharper decline in 2020 was partly caused by an erroneous (or erroneously listed as the primary) cause of death – more with Covid than with Covid.
      The second phenomenon is worrying. I haven't read a plausible, well-substantiated explanation for it anywhere.

      Reply
      1. Hans Verwaart

        Statistics Netherlands (CBS) and the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) have released "some" data on the vaccination status of the deceased. But at the level of the causes of death, they remain silent.

        I find that remarkable.

        It would not surprise us if the percentage of vaccinates are higher than expected with cardiovascular and accidental fall.

        That can of course also be completely reversed. But then I think: if that were the case, they would have come out with it.

        Reply
  7. Hans Verwaart

    Beats. We initially looked at the average of the 2015-2019 period and not at the trend, which is steadily declining until the beginning of 2021. So there is indeed a significant increase from the beginning of 2021.

    Reply
  8. Michael Sirk

    Thank you for your answer.
    I have another question about these causes of death reporting that you might answer.
    Table states;
    Not received a cause of death form
    % of the total number of deceased people
    2015 0,2%
    2016 0,4%
    2017 0,5%
    2018 0,5%
    2019 0,5%
    2020 1,0%
    2021 1,5%
    2022* 2,0%
    January 2023* 2.4%
    February 2023* 2.5%
    March 2023* 2.5%
    April 2023* 2,9%
    Mei 2023* 3,5%
    June 2023* 3.7%
    July 2023* 5.0%

    I assume that it is for a part of death declaration that will be received at a later time. But I don't think that's the whole story. Do you have an explanation for this?

    Reply
  9. Hans Verwaart

    Good point. Of course if you look at the past month after month, the number decreases.
    But if someone, for example, made a 19-month curve, he would be increasingly supposed to be higher.

    This indicates increased workload on the one hand, but on the other hand also death due to "vague" complaints. We don't know what to fill in, so we don't fill in anything.

    The cause of death R99 "unknown" accounts for as many as almost 7,000 deaths in 2022, while just over 4,000 were expected from the five-year trend 2015-2019.

    But the eyes remain closed. Tonight also at Pointer: Tinnitus (ringing in the ears) is caused by too loud noise. Yes, there is certainly a cause, but why the explosion now???

    Reply

Post a Comment

Je e-mailadres wordt niet gepubliceerd. Required fields are marked with *