Shortlink: t.ly/WUMpv
The persistence with which our government virologists continue to deny evident scientifically substantiated facts has given the impression that we are dealing with a fossilized field. Or with an unfortunate selection of incompetent officials. Consider the droplet theory and the zoonosis theory. Where does this tenacity come from, is it a real lack of progressive insight or is there more to it? Spoiler: There's much, much more to it.
De druppelaars en de zoönati dienen een gemeenschappelijk doel: de virusuitbraak moest al vanaf het eerste begin tegen elke prijs onmiddellijk weggemaakt worden. We need this to go away. Now. En als zo'n weg eenmaal is ingeslagen is, het point-of-no-return al snel voorbij. Dus die lijn wordt doorgezet, zelfs nu alles eigenlijk al op tafel ligt. Met als gevolg: angst, lockdowns, avondklokken, bedreigingen, isolatie, vaccinatiedwang, valsheid in geschrifte, vuile en schadelijke vaccins, een legendarische economische terugval, het niet uitvoeren van moties en WOB-verzoeken, veel te veel overlijdens en natuurlijk verdwenen miljarden, alleen al in Nederland. Daar moet iets aan ten grondslag liggen. Hoe past dat allemaal in elkaar?
TL; DR Summary
Zoonosis: Denial of a lab leak
Previous lab leaks have simply been reported. Why did this particular lab leak have to be erased from history as soon as possible? That was the political sensitivity.
- U.S. involvement
- Prohibited bio-military research
- With the knowledge of scientific leaders
- Circumvention of legislation through outsourcing in China
- Sino-American exchange of knowledge
- Sino-U.S. Cooperation on Potential Biological Weapons
- Spending U.S. taxpayers' money in China
- With the knowledge of government officials and secret services
- Failing supervision
- Accumulation of dysfunction by political and scientific bodies
Drip theory: Denial of bungling
Het is al vele decennia bekend dat besmetting door respiratoire virussen voornamelijk via de lucht gaat. De betrokken virologen houden desondanks krampachtig vast aan besmetting via druppels. Dat is een stuk minder gevaarlijk. Aerogene pathogenen zijn vele malen gevaarlijker, om niet te zeggen 'virologisch onbeheersbaar' (een raam open zetten is geen virologie). Dat maakt aerogene transmissie veel interessanter en tegelijkertijd moeilijker te onderzoeken vanwege de veiligheidsrichtlijnen. Door pathogenen te classificeren als 'niet-aerogeen' houden de virologen een lucratieve markt open.
- Justification of an inadequate level of safety in virological experiments
- Safeguarding exploratory virus creations as the commercial lifeline of virology
- Evasion of safety guidelines with global impact
- Keeping Military Interest in Aerogenic Bioweapons Under the Radar
- Shielding accomplices from important clients (in particular governments/defence and pharmaceutical companies)
Disproportionele maatregelen: Bewijsmateriaal laten verdwijnen - maar ja, dat virus...
We kennen uit spannende series wel de maffia-praktijken van zogenaamde 'afvalverwerkers' die hun chemische rommel overal dumpen waar ze het, vaak met steekpenningen, maar kwijt kunnen. Bestuurders raken gecorrumpeerd, worden chantabel en van het een komt het ander. Wie in zo'n netwerk zit is zijn leven niet zeker, liegt voor zijn hachje, maakt het de capo naar de zin. Die druk valt totaal in het niet vergeleken met het geo-bio-militair-wetenschappelijk complex dat rond virologisch onderzoek is ontstaan en waarmee we nu te maken hebben. Blootgelegd door een virus.
Wanting to keep years of criminal dealings under wraps, because that's what you can call it when you play with the health of the world's population, with the involvement of the two largest world powers and with the knowledge of a billion-dollar pharmaceutical industry, has led to the immediate and unconditional wanting, no, must Stopping the impending unmasking. At any price, no matter what the cost.
Alle zorgvuldig opgebouwde wetenschap ging overboord en elke paniekregel werd uit de kast getrokken. Er moest geïsoleerd, gelockdownd, gecontroleerd, gevaccineerd worden, de Chinezen hadden daar allerlei ideeën over - en die hadden een belangrijke stem. Niet alleen vanwege hun financiële steun aan de WHO maar ook vanwege het bewijsmateriaal dat ze onmiddellijk offline hebben gehaald. Als die hun medische databases weer eens online zetten zal het gauw over zijn met het speculeren... Best een aardig pressiemiddel.
That's the basic idea. And a brave little virus that could not be tamed and that could be turned up or down at will with a PCR test. If you find it interesting, read the extensive story below. Or look at maurice.nl, die vatte het artikel netjes samen, zij het dat hij het meest controversiële en naar complottheorieën stinkende element niet overnam. Daarom heb ik die kern nog eens benadrukt in 'It's worse than you think'
The why of zoonosi
It will come as no surprise that the zoonosis theory is so popular among virologists. These specialists and their investors in the virus industry (viroscientists, pharmaceutical companies, health institutes, the military) are desperately clinging to a zoonotic origin of SARS-CoV-2 in the lab leak discussion. In doing so, they indirectly defend virus research in which viruses are modified to see if and how they become more dangerous to humans. These viruses are built because in this way we prepare ourselves for combating them, should nature come up with the same idea as the researchers, is the noble thought.
It is worth noting that this is exactly what has happened according to the virologists: nature has fabricated exactly what was predicted by the virus researchers. So even if you go along with their reasoning, it doesn't seem like we got much out of the insider information.
Waarom betrokken partijen een mogelijk lab-ongeluk blijven ontkennen ligt voor de hand, op het eerste gezicht: een 'ongelukje' dat een wereldwijde ramp veroorzaakt, daar wil je niets mee te maken hebben. Maar er zit nog veel meer aan vast. De gezondheidsbewakers (Fauci, NIH, FDA, Witte Huis, geheime diensten) willen absoluut niet exposed worden voor onwettig gebruik van hun mandaten. Ook niet voor landverraad. Voor geen prijs zullen ze toegeven dat ze op de hoogte waren van a) levensgevaarlijk bio-militair onderzoek, b) waarvoor zij Amerika's grootste tegenstrever, de Chinezen, nog geld gaven ook. Alles gebeurde onder de radar, en met reden. De overheid betaalde via een NGO, die het geld weer doorsluisde naar China. Dat moest hoe dan ook uit de publiciteit worden gehouden. Niet gelukt.
Acknowledging that state of affairs would not only mean the end of a lucrative branch of viro-science. It reaches much further into the industrial-military virus complex, including the pharmaceutical companies, the regulators and the government officials who operate in it and have contributed – sometimes in a personal capacity. This is where personal liability comes into play and behaviour that can be described as criminal, even involving human lives. And not just a few.
Through all kinds of avenues, from scientific journals to social media, the executors (the virologists) have pulled out the registers from pangolin to raccoon dog: it had to be a natural virus, otherwise it would be over and done with both the American-Chinese collaborators and the livelihoods of the viro-industrialists. The importance of the pharmaceutical companies goes without saying, they profit from every epidemic and in turn fund virological research.
De betrokken virologen hoopten zich te kunnen beroepen op 'wetenschappelijke samenwerking ten dienste van de gezondheid van de wereldbevolking' en waarom zou dat niet Amerikaans-Chinees mogen? Het is per slot wetenschap, het gaat hier niet om de chip-industrie waar bijvoorbeeld beperkingen worden opgelegd aan ASML, als het om leveringen aan China gaat. Want samenwerking met China, dat ligt gevoelig, zeker in Amerika.
And military aspects? The involvement and interest of both the American Academy of Military Medical Science and the Chinese Military Academy of Medicine participated, didn't that give you pause for thought?
No, that was no association at all for virologists. Because there were often officials in green uniforms with berets or caps on? No, that's just not an association for a scientist.
De blinde paniek direct na de uitbraak is goed voorstelbaar. Ineens zien we persoontjes die het 's werelds machtigste conglomeraten lange tijd naar de zin hebben gemaakt en wie het zweet uitbreekt na een screw-up van hun zaakjes waarvan ze van tevoren hadden kunnen weten (en eigenlijk wel wisten) dat het een keer fout zou gaan.
De paniekreactie waarmee het vuurtje onmiddellijk uitgetrapt moest worden, dat hebben we geweten. De Chinezen hadden goede adviezen en dus werden al onze maatschappelijk verantwoorde protocollen en opgebouwde kennis overboord gegooid. Het virus moest en zou ingedamd worden. Dat liep volkomen uit de hand. Om de benodigde dwangmaatregelen er in de westerse wereld doorheen te krijgen moest er angst worden gezaaid, mensen moest doodsangst worden aangejaagd. De ernst van het virus werd zwaar overdreven en dat bleef zo, ook toen al duidelijk was dat de dodelijkheid meer richting griep ging dan richting Ebola. De WHO werd bang gemaakt (Tedros besefte later pas hoe het werkelijk zat), politici werden bang gemaakt - ingrijpen, ingrijpen, ingrijpen!
De vaccin-farmaceuten werden onder druk gezet. Die gingen dus voorwaarden stellen zoals omzetgaranties en vrijwaring van schade. Natuurlijk deden onze overheden mee want de EU deed mee want Amerika deed mee. Amerika moest natuurlijk wel want zat er zelf tot de nek in, via Fauci en de NIH. De EU kon gelukkig snel wat regelen via het netwerk van van der Leyen. In de contracten is getekend voor omzetgarantie. Dat zouden weggegooide miljarden zijn als er tussentijds een geneesmiddel zou komen. Dat verklaart ook weer wat. Zo past alles beter in elkaar dan in andere scenario's die ik heb gezien. Ik noem het een scenario en geen complot omdat het allemaal niet van tevoren is bedacht. Het is opportunism onder druk van enorme krachten.
Anyway, I described this scenario in broad strokes two years ago, read the updated version in The Biggest Cover-Up in History
So it's not surprising, this zoonosis hype from a virological angle. Still, the threat could have been exaggerated if they had claimed that the virus could be transmitted through the air, which is really dangerous! But that didn't happen, on the contrary. That, too, can be explained.
The why of the droplet virologists
Een lab-ongeluk dat een wereldwijde ramp veroorzaakt is desastreus voor een vakgebied dat drijft op virusgeknutsel. Die spielerei is interessant als je veel experimenten kunt doen en van alles kunt uitproberen. Je weet nooit precies wat het resultaat zal zijn, daarvoor doe je immers die experimenten met kunstmatig samengestelde (chimerische) virussen. Voor die creativiteit is speelruimte nodig en die speelruimte ontbreekt als je onderzoek moet doen op het hoogste beveiligingsniveau. Dat zou alles traag en te duur maken. En het zou misschien niet eens mogen vanwege de enorme risico's.
Before we go any further, let's first establish that there is no doubt whatsoever about the aerosol transmission of respiratory viruses, with a few rare exceptions, but even here it is not 100% certain. Otherwise, read the 206 references to scientific studies a piece in Science that is worth reading. Almost all of them pre-2020. Or let yourself be convinced by a simple, clear and amusing experiment from 1987(!), described in Playing poker with infections. Or read the Arguments against aerosol denial by Prof. Jimenez. Or take a look at the list below from 2015.
Aerosol knowledge dated 2015, list of aerogenic pathogens (click to view)
R.M. Jones, L.M. Brosseau, Aerosol transmission of infectious disease, J Occup Environ Med, 57 (2015), pp. 501-508
Je zou toch zeggen dat bij wet geregeld is hoe er met pathogenen (ziekteverwekkers) moet worden omgegaan. Als de veiligheid van de burger in het geding is, zijn er over het algemeen duidelijk omschreven wetsartikelen te vinden. Denk aan brandveiligheid, vuurwapens, vervoermiddelen, noem maar op - maar voor pathogenen?
There are no laws for biosafety of laboratories. There are guidelines, generally based on CDC Advisories (Amerikaanse Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). Er wordt daar onderscheid gemaakt tussen 4 beveiligingsniveau's. Op de hoogste niveau's (BSL-3 en BSL-4) wordt het werk erkend als uiterst risicovol en daarmee aandachttrekkend, duur, traag en veel minder aantrekkelijk.
The basic rules for BSL-3 and 4 have everything to do with airborne transmission. If there is only a risk of infection through contact or eating or drinking, then BSL-2 standards are sufficient, largely comparable to what is followed in dental practices: goggles, gloves, face masks, thorough hygiene. However, a dental practice does not work with pathogens. For this purpose, there is a special cabinet with extraction.
Hoe gevaarlijk 'aerosolized pathogens' worden ingeschat mag blijken uit het feit dat zelfs labwerk met een pipet altijd in zo'n afgesloten kast met afzuiging moet plaatsvinden - want bij het werken met een pipetje zouden weleens aerosolen vrij kunnen komen. Kun je nagaan.
Hieronder enkele paragrafen uit de vijfde editie van CDC's "Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories". Voor de zekerheid heb ik de laatste editie van vóór de coronacrisis genomen. Dat waren immers de regels die toen golden.
For example, we read there:
- SARS is thought to be spread primarily through droplets, aerosols, and possibly fomites. The natural reservoir for SARS CoV is unknown.
- The exact mode of transmission of SARS-CoV laboratory infection has not been determined, but in clinical settings the primary mode of transmission appears to be by direct or indirect contact of mucous membranes with infectious respiratory droplets.
- SARS-CoV multiplication in cell culture and the initial characterization of viral agents recovered in cultures of SARS specimens should be performed in a BSL-3 facility with BSL-3 practices and procedures.
- Inoculation of animals for possible recovery of SARS-CoV from SARS samples, studies, and protocols inoculating animals for characterization of suspected SARS agents should be performed in ABSL-3 facilities with ABSL-3 working practices.
ad 1) Het natuurlijke reservoir is onbekend. In de labs werkten ze met SARS-CoV virussen waarvan ze de natuurlijke herkomst niet weten. Die virussen zijn misschien gewoon een keer aangenomen van een verdwaalde pizzakoerier maar het werk is zo ingewikkeld dat dergelijke banaliteiten natuurlijk niet bij te houden zijn. Geen associatie mee (doet denken aan 'geen actieve herinnering aan.')
ad 2) The mode of transmission in a clinical setting is mainly through direct contact. That is obvious, they are not there with infected people in poorly ventilated rooms, then automatically fallen test tubes remain.
ad 3) Tinkering with SARS viruses is only allowed in BSL-3 facilities. Assessing Unknown Virus? BSL-3!
ad 4) Het gerotzooi met dieren die (dood)ziek worden gemaakt moet op ABSL-3. Dat is BLS-3 met extra voorzieningen voor dierverzorging en -veiligheid, zoals afgesloten kooisystemen en speciale ventilatiesystemen. Om niet alleen de medewerkers maar ook de dieren "veilig te houden." Denk er maar niet te lang over na.
ChatGPT provides a summary that corresponds well with what can be found about BSL-2 and BSL-3:
- BSL-2 Laboratories deal with agents that can cause disease in humans, but are not typically airborne in a laboratory environment. Procedures that may generate aerosols or splashes are performed within biological safety cabinets or other physical containment devices to prevent infection.
- BSL-3 Laboratories are designed for work with pathogens that can be transmitted through the air and cause serious or potentially fatal diseases. At this level, facilities implement technical measures such as specialized ventilation systems to prevent aerogenic transmission. Employees use personal protective equipment, including respirators, and work with biological safety cabinets or other containment devices when handling these pathogens.
Het is dus niet verwonderlijk dat de virologen niet alleen de zoönosetheorie aanhangen maar ook de druppeltheorie omarmen als basis voor besmettelijkheid. Respiratoire virussen zijn niet-aerogeen tenzij anders bewezen is, is hun adagium. Dat is nu eenmaal zo. Nieuwe onbekende virussen 'waar we niets van weten' gaan volgens de virologen via druppels, ze hoeven dus not -contrary to what the guidelines prescribe- to be treated at BSL-3 level. That would be expensive and would slow things down. So those virologists couldn't go to America with that research, it was too tricky. In China, they are a bit more accommodating when it comes to bringing in the American technology with the potential to make bioweapons. So we deviated to that because research could be done there at BSL-2 level.
Clearly, this is no longer about monitoring public health. It is about monitoring 'continuity of research for the benefit of public health'. In direct messages between those involved, it is even said that the Chinese investigation, if it were to take place in America, would have to take place at BSL-4 level. Even a new BSL-4 PLUS level has been suggested.
Exploratory virological research would become practically impossible if it could no longer be done at the BSL-2 level. As a result, the bulk of the better-paid work will disappear. Virologists don't like that. They like to see how you can make bird flu dangerous for humans and whether viruses can also be built that lead to neurological disorders. Preferably by combining not-so-pathogenic virus A with a not-so-contagious virus B. The freedom of a BSL-2 lab offers that research space, even though it may well result in a virus in which the infectivity of virus A is combined with the virulence of virus B.
En als je parallel daaraan ook vaccin en een test ontwikkelt, mag je op grote belangstelling rekenen. Oorlogen gaan er heel anders uitzien als je je eigen mensen vaccineert en vervolgens bij de vijand het bijbehorende virus loslaat. Het "beschermen van de eigen troepen".
Achter de starheid waarover iedereen zich verbaasde zit dus heel wat meer dan alleen een ingesleten dogma uit vroeger tijden. Het is een omerta geworden, een vanzelfsprekende zwijgcultuur. De druppeltheorie is gegroeid uit dezelfde bodem waarin het lableak werd begraven. Het is de arbeidspas voor virologen. Dankzij het volhouden van 'druppelbesmetting tenzij anders bewezen' hebben zij goede sier kunnen maken met goedkoop onderzoek dat in vele opzichten hoogst interessant was voor kapitaalkrachtige partijen: farmaceuten, defensie en (dus) ook overheden. Er kon uit bodemloze fondsen worden geput in een zelfregulerend systeem waarin door de farmacie gesubsidieerde toezichthouders zich belangrijk waanden.
And the governments, the Dutch government for example? He was almost in the front row with Marion Koopmans and Ron Fouchier in the ranks, so they saw opportunities. It guarantee of health is one thing. You just have to. But it's not supervise of health suddenly offers administrators many more options, especially with an appropriate Public Health Act. That is a temptation that is difficult to resist for a director, especially for one from the D66/Rutte/WEF culture, with the coming climate disaster in mind.
The logic was completely gone. There was no critical ability to identify this. A zoonotic pandemic without air transmission is unthinkable in our Western world with clean water, good food and basic hygiene. Then the virus would have had to become aerogenic first and that didn't happen, it already was. So how can they maintain among themselves that the virus is both zoonotic and non-aerogenic? You tell me...
I asked ChatGPT again. He is often stuck because he has been trained with illogical rules. What the media listen to breathlessly is inconsistent gibberish for a computer. That's why ChatGPT got so attached at one point that influenza, which according to ChatGPT is mainly in large droplets, first had to fall to the ground in order to infect effectively, unlike corona:
maar, even later...
Nicely lined up, Anton! It highlights the important points and provides an explanation behind the craziness. The mRNA idiocy probably needs a whole separate chapter.
What also surprises me: where does this vaccine fascination come from? The idea that a vaccine should be devised for almost every disease. Is it indeed 100% commercially driven? Is it even possible to make vaccines against rapidly mutating respiratory viruses? In any case, you skip an essential part of the immune system -the mucous membranes-.
What do you think: Does it make sense to develop vaccines against -relatively harmless- respiratory viruses? The usefulness of the flu shot has also never been proven.
No, vaccinating against rapidly mutating respiratory viruses is not very useful, for the reasons you mention. Maybe it will help with vulnerable elderly people, for 1 season. In any case, mucosal defenses remain the basis.
In terms of mRNA: The pharmaceutical companies couldn't have a traditional virus ready so quickly. An excellent opportunity to use the promising mRNA process, which in the future will be used to Lego's vaccine at the push of a button by the computer, thanks in part to standardized cutting places. But with safeguards, of course, because laboratory animals were still dying. The governments signed – 'now we have to get on with it!' they had to do SOMETHING, they sensed their fear of death.
I think that time pressure around vaccine development has been debunked by Professor Robert Clancy. I saw that in a Campbell broadcast. Also just an opinion, but he is very much at home in the matter. Of course, most of the time spent developing a vaccine is spent on extensive tests that typically take years. And that's where they've cut corners. I believe that producing large numbers is faster. And much cheaper..... The pharmaceutical industry will not use that last argument to the outside world:-). But that does increase profit margins.
It would be nice to have a balanced story like yours break into MSM. So logical....
Where is the proof that even 1 disease is contagious?
That has been no more than a very dirty assumption for centuries and almost all of us have been poisoned completely unnecessarily since we were born!
👉 tinyurl.com/voorgelogen
There is a lot of evidence of this. This is easy to understand: https://virusvaria.nl/pokeren-met-besmettingen/
Forget those pathogenic viruses
I continue to think it's a scary focus on a virus and a vaccine. Even if we accept the spread of aerosols, we remain stuck in a strict medical narrative.
Why not pay attention to the other aerosol-spreading pathogens during the winter favorable for aerosols when the natural immunity (less vitamin D available) against infections decreases.
Perhaps a virus is not even necessary in this case when respiratory infections develop. Let alone a vaccine that is believed to protect us against this.
See:
https://music.amazon.com/es-ar/podcasts/36852c3a-7e5c-4b9c-85d4-16e220eb1b37/episodes/b4f5b31c-620b-455a-917a-bcefaa714713/dr-sam-bailey-the-virus-cover-story-with-jon-rappoport
(Can also be found at Odyssey with images)
Jump out of the medical box! For many, this is still a mission impossible.
Can you name a few other aerosol-spreading seasonal diseases?
I tried to watch the video, 10 minutes and then skipped and watched some snippets. I can't do anything with it. I know that there is an undiscussed problem with iatrogenic mortality. But beyond that?
We shouldn't rely on people who are better at something than we are, I remembered, and Cronkite was an actor. I'm afraid that it will also come down to the fact that viruses don't exist and people can't infect each other. I've had those discussions before, and I'm not receptive to them. There is no evidence for this (but there is evidence to the contrary) and no open issues are explained. There is also no 'more consistent' or 'more conclusive' story.
In addition, this blog was started because of the corona debacle that began to take shape in the spring of 2020 and grew to criminal proportions. I understand that it is not the only abuse in the world (there is also a lot going on with 'Climate', for example) but 'virus varia' is the central theme. At least for now.
Once upon a time..
Let's say it's the beginning of March, winter is almost over.
The resistance of the older Dutch with the possible exception of those who hibernated in another hemisphere (where their shadow was shorter than their length) is at its lowest level.
There is a highly contagious but harmless coronavirus circulating in a lab for humans using animals that has been picked up by the youth.
Young people with a cold are obliged to spend a few hours with their grandparents in institutions and at home.
The heating is high. The air is too dry. The mucous membranes slightly irritated. It is still cold outside and the specific humidity is low, the (nursing) homes are well insulated. After all, a cold by an old person is quickly caught. Draughts are avoided.
Many elderly people with multimorbidity for whom they take many medications, each with their side effects, die especially in those regions where
the air quality is deteriorating and there are already a lot of pneumonia (bio)aerosols due to mega barns with goats and poultry in the air. The grassland has also just been treated with glyphosate.
In a faraway country that is considered a source, a lockdown has been imposed in a heavily polluted city with its region and a gigantic hospital has been set up in no time.
There is panic there or panic is being acted upon with the aim of getting the population (which had previously revolted because of the air pollution at play) under control. Would the
Americans who were involved in the development of said virus
have secretly deployed a truly sickening bioweapon. The Americans are panicking if the co-production could be a
have given a more serious pathogenic variant than expected (could the so-called, fictitious X, made up from PR in the service of WHO and virology, really exist?).
The Western media is completely venting the panic. The weak politics that has long since ceased to serve the general interest and allows things to take their course, sees its chance to finally take apparently decisive action. A wise Chinese Wu Wei is (with the exception of then not yet NATO country Sweden where the independent 'OMT' head has learned from his mistakes at the time of the swine flu), doing nothing is no longer an option.
The mass mortality among the elderly is attributed to the youth visit (that card was a reference to the poker experiment) and a 'life-threatening' virus.
There is no other way. That life-threatening virus has killed them. After all, they are otherwise well cared for under very good conditions.
Because the life-threatening virus can of course affect everyone here, we will quickly go into lockdown here.
We are waiting for the life-saving, safe and effective vaccine. There is nothing else to do.
Once upon a time..
Let's say it's the beginning of March, winter is almost over.
The resistance of the older Dutch with the possible exception of those who hibernated in another hemisphere (where their shadow was shorter than their length) is at its lowest level.
There is a highly contagious but harmless coronavirus circulating in a lab for humans using animals that has been picked up by the youth.
Young people with a cold are obliged to spend a few hours with their grandparents in institutions and at home.
The heating is high. The air is too dry. The mucous membranes slightly irritated. It is still cold outside and the specific humidity is low, the (nursing) homes are well insulated. After all, a cold by an old person is quickly caught. Draughts are avoided.
Many elderly people with multimorbidity for whom they take many medications, each with their side effects, die especially in those regions where
the air quality is deteriorating and there are already a lot of pneumonia (bio)aerosols due to mega barns with goats and poultry in the air. The grassland has also just been treated with glyphosate.
In a faraway country that is considered a source, a lockdown has been imposed in a heavily polluted city with its region and a gigantic hospital has been set up in no time.
There is panic there or panic is being acted upon with the aim of getting the population (which had previously revolted because of the air pollution at play) under control. Would the
Americans who were involved in the development of said virus
have secretly deployed a truly sickening bioweapon. The Americans are panicking if the co-production could be a
have given a more serious pathogenic variant than expected (could the so-called, fictitious X, made up from PR in the service of WHO and virology, really exist?).
The Western media is completely venting the panic. The weak politics that has long since ceased to serve the general interest and allows things to take their course, sees its chance to finally take apparently decisive action. A wise Chinese Wu Wei is (with the exception of then not yet NATO country Sweden where the independent 'OMT' head has learned from his mistakes at the time of the swine flu), doing nothing is no longer an option.
The mass mortality among the elderly is attributed to the youth visit (that card was a reference to the poker experiment) and a 'life-threatening' virus.
There is no other way. That life-threatening virus has killed them. After all, they are otherwise well cared for under very good conditions.
Because the life-threatening virus can of course affect everyone here, we will quickly go into lockdown here.
We are waiting for the life-saving, safe and effective vaccine. There is nothing else to do.
It is said that the goal of gain-of-function research is to protect people and pandemic preparedness. Making protocols and scenarios for what countries should do in the event of a pandemic/bioweapon outbreak.
But what happens if a pandemic is declared in early 2020?
* The decades of accumulated knowledge of research into corona viruses was not shared to save people.
* The 'experts' deliberately steered the media and politicians in the wrong direction as to what kind of corona virus it could be (from market/animals instead of from lab). And so let the population suffocate, literally and figuratively. As a result, appropriate care was postponed unnecessarily for a long time, because people were looking for the wrong kind of virus.
* the carefully crafted protocols and pandemic playbooks that were at WHO for such viruses were already thrown in the trash at the beginning of the pandemic. And the opposite measures were introduced everywhere
So gain-of-function research is useless.
On the website :scientistsforscience.org, virologists sign their vision (and importance) about their work. When asked about the origin of the Sars Cov 2 virus to these virologists, a number of :d they "believe" in the zoonotic transmission of Sars Cov 2 answer. Not once was a scientifically (science) substantiated reliable argument/fact or a reliable publication indicated to confirm their belief. The interested reader of the reports of, among others, Anton's report will be able to conclude by checking the data that virological (science) science is in a degenerative state.
Brilliantly written. Unfortunately, despite the seriousness, I also laughed.
In fact, the BSL level only matters for when the inevitable happens. Take the nuclear calculations. I was assured decades ago that the statistical probability of an accident is negligible, even infinitesimally small. Hmm, let's see, in "50 years" at least 2 very big accidents (Chernobyl and Fukushima), at least 1 big one (3 Mile Island) and an unknown number (because disappeared in the radioactive cover-up) "smaller ones".
Back to BSL-X safety calculations: same wishful thinking calculations. Kul, who puts the cart before the horse.
Those accidents are coming. Whether it's GOF-Ebola from a Colorado lab, the latest metamorphosis of an IS Strangelove genius, or the wet dream of M. Koopmans and R. Fourchier. Those accidents are coming. But even that doesn't matter much.
Why? Because the proverbial back door is wide open.
GOF research is only carried out under safe conditions for human pathogens, but not for the earth beneath our feet.
Organic farms are making and releasing GMO bacteria into our soil soil, without any significant regulation. It only takes one to destroy plant life and our fate is sealed. This has already happened by a hair's breadth with a bacterium that was supposed to convert biomass into alcohol. At the very last minute, it happened to be tested on living plants by a relative outsider – all of which died instantly.
"Wars are going to look very different if you vaccinate your own people and then release the corresponding virus into the enemy. "Protecting one's own troops". "
Dat heeft China dan goed gedaan, want ze hadden heel lang maar 4.800 en uiteindelijk dan ong. 14.000 doden – op zo’n 1.4 miljard inwoners (zie Our World in Data).
Perhaps there is another explanation for the rigid attitude: the measures were not the means but the end. And to do this, science had to be bent towards that goal.
In recent years, we have seen more and more indications that the direction of the measures was in the hands of the national counter-terrorism agency NCTV, which then instructed the OMT to cover these measures scientifically, the government to announce the measures and the media to explain the measures.
In other words, the world turned upside down.
I don't think so. Of course, the NCTV has been called in as coordinator. The fact that he then takes over the direction and the decision tree is because those hotemets were just doing something. They had no idea about the severity, transmission, vaccines and only questioned each other, so there was no knowledge.
Where is the proof that even 1 disease is contagious or that those 'contagious pathogens' actually cause disease?
That has been no more than a very dirty assumption for centuries and almost all of us have been poisoned completely unnecessarily since we were born!
👉 tinyurl.com/voorgelogen
(Jan Ligthart, apologies for the late posting: for some reason this comment ended up in the Trash, among hundreds of Russian spam messages. Perhaps unnecessarily, it was posted after all, for the sake of completeness.
Anton.)
@allen in response to comments from Gerben
Totally agree with your two simple but fundamental sentences.
Where's the evidence? Why poison people on a large scale after frightening them 24/7 through education, mass media, medical industrial complex, orchestrated global fake pandemics in the mass media and coercive State-WHO-corona-NPI measures?
I found this article extremely interesting about the drip theory, but in my opinion it concerns a herd behavior study for insiders in addition to a dubious assumption of micro-organisms as a mono-causal cause of a disease, contagiousness, transmission mechanisms and so on.
In my opinion, the next fundamental question could be: What scientific methodologically based evidence is required to elevate to science the dubious or dirty assumption that a virus is a monocausal cause of a disease? What might that evidence look like?
The philosopher of science Popper states – somewhat succinctly – that only one falsification of a scientific (conspiracy) theory should lead to the theory being rejected as the dirty hypothesis.
Here too, the fundamental methodological question can be asked: what could a scientific methodologically based falsification method look like?
Both angles require that there must be scientific evidence to counter.
According to Dr. Thomas Cowan - in my interpretation - we can find indications in the secret diaries of Louis Pasteur in his confessions that in an experiment POISON must play a role as an INDEPENDENT VARIABLE or as a second independent variable, i.e. a third variable in addition to, for example, a virus.
Example: does the addition of a very small amount of aluminum and/or mercury compound together with a virus in a vaccination demonstrably cause the development of 1 clinical picture?
Part of that evidence will in any case have to be a well-designed experiment in which the harmfulness to the health of people who come into contact with certain poisons is investigated so that there is a chance that the causal relationship can be demonstrated with sufficient significance.
I suggest:
a. to compare employees in an Asian country who are allowed to dispose of PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDS of their precious, recyclable materials in a factory hall in their health over a longitudinal period of 10 years to compare with employees in that same country who do office work in offices in addition to employees who work outside under healthy conditions
b. employees in an African country who work in the open-pit mining where Cobalt or Lithium are mined without PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT and without SAFETY MEASURES, same experimental design as mentioned under a.
c. residents who live close to or in an agricultural area where crop protection products are used, the same experimental design as mentioned under a.
d. Infants up to and including 2 years of age who have followed the complete National Vaccination Program can be compared longitudinally in terms of their health development in terms of vaccinations for at least 10 years with infants who have received ZERO vaccinations from the National Vaccination Program.
e. Compare research set up as under d. in a poor country for example like Bulgaria where little money is spent on healthcare and Pharma products with a rich country like the Netherlands or even better France
f. Compare longitudinally over 10 years the health of people who inhale a lot of exhaust fumes given their living location close to highways, busy intersections within built-up areas and airports, with that of people who clearly live in “clean” areas
The classical Newtonian experimental approach in physics was and still is based on 1 effect that must have 1 cause. Later people started to look beyond this type of mechanized worldview. Jumping to the present, you could speak of a vision that takes into account the multi-factor reality.
In my opinion, the fundamental question must be asked: what about all that “evidence” with the THIRD VARIABLE PROBLEM? In addition to the independent and dependent variables, which variable plays a (how large) role in the experiment? Which confounding third variable was excluded in what way? Was exclusion perhaps wrongly omitted?
As a third variable I propose:
materialistic variables
1. poisons for example Perfluorinated compounds, Glyphosate/Roundup,
2. metal poisons
3. Electromagnetic-magnetic giffen 123456G, 50Hz
4. …………
systemic variables:
1. immune system
2. mRNA
3. Toxic tax in 10 million chronically ill people in the Netherlands, half of whom have more than 1 chronic disease.
4……..
mental variables, i.e. the influence from the mind
1. angst
2. knowledge of role/own immune system
3. confidence in your own immune system
4. ………..
In the experiments/research designs outlined above, humans play the role of laboratory animals. You could quickly set up longitudinally comparable research with laboratory animals in a shorter time.
I make myself available as a test subject to be coughed, spluttered, aerosolized, dripped and the like in a row in the face from less than 10 centimeters by 10 people who are suffering from the COVID19 disease in March 2020 with a correctly isolated RKI-standardized novel corona virus on the aerosols plus the accompanying official simple set of Covid19 symptoms list. These people may also appear to suffer from a loss of taste and/or smell a little later.
Ultimately, a well-designed experiment with well-screened test subjects in terms of health and lifestyle will provide a good indication of the still hypothetical virological conspiracy theory. Accurate repetition of this experiment should lead to falsification of the monocausal disease-causing virus theory.