What exactly the spike protein that is generated by injected mRNA does in the body in the long term is the subject of intense debate. There are no indications that the mRNA itself does much harm. It teaches the body cells to produce spike protein, which the immune system recognizes as harmful. The spike protein was originally presented as a 'harmless' package that remained at the site of the injection.
By recognizing that packaging, the immune system can be trained for when the real virus is in it in the event of an actual infection. It is now clear that the spike proteins are not as innocent as thought. They are co-agents of dreaded symptoms. The immune system apparently targets these substances for a reason. Even though they are made by their own cells.
By the method of administration, injection, they can also enter the bloodstream. Byram Bridle explains that the mRNA technique has been developed for better distribution throughout the body, which is a solution, for example, in the fight against metastatic cancer. Whether it is also the right strategy to combat a lung infection is the question.
High dosages
Ook bij dierproeven werden hoge concentraties spike eitwit aangetroffen op diverse plekken in de dierenlijfjes. In silico (computermodellen) bleek op welke type cellen de eiwitten goed zullen aanslaan. Dat strookte met waargenomen zeldzame bijwerkingen. Ook bij obducties op mensen zijn de spikes gevonden op diverse plekken in het lichaam. (Het effect op bloedplaatjes is inmiddels breed erkend). Een en ander was voor de Canadese "viral immunologist" Byram Bridle reden om de alarmklok te luiden: het spike eiwit was zelf de veroorzaker van Covid-19 symptomen en dus essentieel onderdeel van de ziekte, mede-veroorzaker van de schade die de ziekte Covid-19 oplevert. Dat bericht ging inderdaad "viral". Byram klonk in de gewraakte podcast (can be listened to, discussed and translated here in article 28 May) rather hurried and panicked and moreover he sounded as if he really knew about it. That's not a reassuring combination.
Unashamed counter-gas
Byram Brydle is finished from that moment on. Whoever googles it comes to a fake website. Fake social media accounts have been set up. His family has been threatened. He is one of the many concerned scientists who wants the best for everyone, just like his colleagues who think differently about vaccinations. He respects them, but conversely the reactions are very different, as he says in the video below in which he also briefly explains his story. I have to say that it all sounded a bit more alarmist in the podcast. The video below is already a month old. He has received little attention. Just like the warnings of Robert Malone, wrongly referred to by some as 'the inventor of mRNA', which in turn provides sufficient grounds for a total debunking.
If this scares you, read the debunk, that's good. Fortunately, there is something to be said about Bridle's concern. Then you read that quantities in the test laboratories on laboratory animals were up to 1000x higher than the quantities we receive. Poor animals. And no wonder that this can be found in large quantities everywhere in the bodies, it has nothing to do with normal expected interactions. 'So that has actually been very poorly researched', I think in turn.
It is logical in itself: to see if something occurs perhaps 1 in 10,000 times, you do not have enough of 100 test mice and 1000. So they take ten and they inject them with an insanely high dose to be able to study what those proteins possibly do in the animal body. Not realistic, not with humans, no expected interactions.
Debunkers don't just take down Bridle
Dat nu dan als tegenwerping wordt gezegd dat die proeven niet representatief zijn geweest betekent dus ook dat er eigenlijk geen proeven zijn gedaan die iets laten zien van het effect van de echte vaccinatie op mensen. De meeste tegenargumenten in de debunk komen neer op de redenatie: "Bridle says so, but it's not scientifically proven.". Nee dat klopt, maar het tegendeel dus ook niet. Dat maakt het tot een heel normale wetenschappelijke discussie waar fact checken niet zoveel zin heeft want de facts zijn er simpelweg nog niet, die moeten nog worden vastgesteld en dat is precies waar we nog middenin zitten. Dat is al erg genoeg na miljarden injecties.
