It is becoming increasingly difficult for corona critics to bridge the growing knowledge gap with Op1 viewers and quality newspaper readers. Earlier I wrote about medical professionals I spoke to, up to a medical professor, who turned out to be unaware of the current excess mortality or, if they now face the excess mortality, condone that non-performance with previous ignorance. How do you react? I made an effort that can be of service to others.
Professionals and the unsuspecting
A hospital manager: "In any case, we knew that the care would be overrun. We had to do something."
(Note: Incorrect predictions from Imperial College blew up the panic narrative. Unvalidated models are apparently sufficient reason to cause havoc, even in retrospect.)
An experienced GP objected: "Yes, but there were really bright minds in the OMT. A lot of good has been done." I asked, "Name three things?" After a moment's thought - he knew he shouldn't mention vaccinations - he said: "The advice to wash hands, for example. Hygiene is very important in infectious diseases."
(Note: advice such as 'hand washing' has diverted attention from the dominant spread factor of respiratory diseases such as Covid: contaminated air. It is virtually impossible to transmit such viruses through indirect contact1 Read article: Playing poker with infections, including the text of this article, also as a Dutch version.)
A professor (Medical Prof. Dr. at one of our universities) said with a laugh, when I mentioned excess mortality: "Well, that won't be too bad!"
An ex-director of a hospital group: "If there had been excess mortality, we would have known."
Here we are with excess mortality deniers. Or are they just as well suspicious people who rarely, if ever, hear about it in the big talk shows and quality newspapers?
Ik raakte onlangs in gesprek met een mental coach, het ging over over psychobiologie. Zij vroeg hoe ik geïnteresseerd was geraakt in die Mind&Body materie. Ik legde uit dat dat met mijn laatste blog-artikel te maken had. Even later viel het woord “oversterfte”. Ze vroeg: “Ja? Is er echt oversterfte? Maar hoe weet je dat dan?”
She gave me time to explain why I have been reasonably concerned about excess mortality and the corona policy for two years. She understood and reacted in shock. That was the reason for me to write the story: a kind of introduction to the over-mortality problem. If you immediately start five steps further (causes, speculation, corruption), you will soon be a conspiracy theorist.
A URL you can forward
Since virus variety also has an outlet function for me, the site is not so suitable for referring unsuspecting people. That's a Cold Turkey they'll understandably soon flee. People turn away in disbelief or simply point to their foreheads. That's why I put that approach on another site: onverklaardeoversterfte.nl. It was quite a task for me to describe the situation in neutral terms. Hopefully that worked out a bit and is a URL to refer curious blue-pillers to. I hope it can help some of you.
Don't blame people if they are not aware, but offer them dosed information using the teaspoon method. After all, it is perfectly normal that certain information has eluded them. That makes it incomprehensible to them what others are so worried about. So I tried to describe the worrisome situation as factually as possible, as a first introduction to the matter. Unfortunately, this cannot be done entirely without figures.
If there are suggestions to make it more accessible, or if there are inaccuracies in it, I'd love to read them in the comments section below.
Pages will soon be added with information about possible causes of the unexplained excess mortality. The main candidates are delayed care, lung Covid, measures and vaccinations.
We have therefore had the most important excess mortality issues of the moment.
Other excess mortality factors are partly speculative and have already been largely treated for virus varia, such as:
- Declaring all knowledge about the transmission of respiratory diseases useless
- Declaring all knowledge about the treatment of flu useless
- Promoting false protection: washing hands, social distancing and face masks
- Not protecting vulnerable elderly people by ventilation/air cleaning
- Banning promising off-label medication
To learn from this, the bottom stone will have to come up. Where did all those mistakes come from? Does the pharmaceutical/regulator model still work in a small world in which business has been pleasant for decades? What is the function of the media and how did they take up their role? How do politicians determine their uniform strategies?
One would hope that another policy debacle could be prevented if these processes could be exposed. Presumably that will not work, even if guilty parties are found and prosecuted. Then next time all prepared knowledge will simply go overboard as soon as a small group of experts manages to spread fear of death and those in power use it as a means of coercion.
In any case, the answer to the question "Is there excess mortality?" is: yes, there is large excess mortality, which has grown every year since 2020. In the last 3 years, about 35 people a day died more than expected.
https://onverklaardeoversterfte.nl
Related themes are quickly pushed into the conspiracy corner, so how we can ever convey that I don't know:
- the dysfunction of parliamentary democracy
- The fusion of the trias politica
- the failure to oversee academic integrity among the patting academic elite
- conflict of interest
- network corruption
- censorship
- the growing influence of globalists and technocrats
- The motives for banning promising (and sometimes proven effective) medication
- The role of the royal family
- Big Tech's guiding disinformation strategy in consultation with governments and other media
- the substandard national decision-making as shown by WOB documents
- the influence of the industry lobby (i.e. Big Pharma) on scientific journals, on medical research, on health policy
and so on. These are all things that we also see in other dossiers, for example in climate policy. These, too, are things that the critics are concerned about. Perhaps they are even more serious because systemic and structural, with the potential to cause even greater disasters.
What it should start with is transparency, to be demanded unconditionally by independent critical media – because that is where the key lies. Media that do not insist on this are neither independent nor critical. Unwelcome science should also be able to find a platform in the media. Then the masses will follow and then politics will have to.
For the time being, that is a step too far. First, let's outline the problem.
See for that https://onverklaardeoversterfte.nl
References
- 1Read article: Playing poker with infections
Another great contribution, Anton. People are still anxiously ignoring the facts. Instead of recognizing that something is wrong, one washes one's hands in innocence. What I found most scandalous was the fact that LAREB completely concealed the first reports of (dozens of) deaths after the rollout of vaccinations. How hypocritical and criminal can one be? You can count on this being discussed at a high level (starting with Kant, via de Jonge to Rutte et al.). In fact, we have all, knowingly, been cheated by those who pulled the strings; strings with blood on them. Blood, lots of blood.
Good initiative that new website. Everything is also neatly and clearly worded. Nevertheless, I would restore some typos here and there because otherwise the reliability of the content will soon be doubted. If people start reading with any suspicion, they will use everything to serve the messenger with the unwanted news. I also noticed that there is no reference to excess mortality abroad. As it is presented now, it looks like a Dutch problem, and it certainly isn't. Of course, this can take a lot of extra work/time, but it may also be possible to treat excess mortality abroad with a few accurate references. I am thinking, among other things, of the well-known videos of John Campbell.
If you see a typo I'd love to hear it, I'll run it through the spellchack 😉 again.
I prefer not to quote Campbell, who is already being disqualified as a wappie.
Don't know if this one will be in the right place. But be a little shocked by Anton's reaction that Campbell is now seen as a wappie. Surely this man is strictly adhering to the facts? His video about that 14-year-old Japanese girl who died has been removed from YouTube. But not a word was a lie.
It is precisely the most honest researchers who are dismissed as wavy as soon as they look beyond pfizer's product brochure. Outside our bubble, Campbell is looked at sympathetically. He would only do it for the views...
Then we have to cherish our bubble for the time being:-). Has there ever been any substantive criticism of Campbell? It's always framing, never facts. What a dastardly way to push people into a corner. Sometimes I wish I was still naïve.
Indeed. Simpler and better: links to euromomo.eu and usmortality.com with a few graphs.
Foreign countries are still coming. That will be a separate page. I can already mention it. In any case, it is too much for this article. People who have never looked at those websites and graphs should have an explanation. It quickly becomes too advanced, like this https://virusvaria.nl/landen-met-hoogste-oversterfte-kregen-de-laagste-vaccinatiegraad/
@Henk No typo to be found... Which one am I overlooking?
Statistics Netherlands no longer publishes mortality figures per week. Nevertheless, these figures should be found in their database.
Does anyone know where exactly these figures can be found?
If they are not published, they are not publicly available, I think. Do you think so?
Take a look at the Eurostat website, which is the EU's CBS. Eurostat probably also has weekly mortality figures for all Member States, including the Netherlands. Those figures may have been delayed by a month or two months.
The OECD also has mortality rates on a weekly basis, but from a somewhat larger group of countries.
Please note: both organisations may also have excess mortality figures, but these probably do not correspond to those of CBS.
These can be found here: https://opendata.cbs.nl/#/CBS/nl/dataset/70895ned/table?ts=1680870846522
Kind regards, Hans
Yes, but Hans, those figures only go up to week 13. We're already in week 16. They no longer publish the figures, at least not weekly.
Anton, we'll see next Friday. Normally – until two weeks ago – an estimate of week 14 would have been given last Friday, which could have been adjusted up or down by about 50-100 the following week (i.e. next Friday).
If they have omitted that estimate now, they should post all the figures for week 14 next Friday.
We'll see!
Kind regards, Hans
This was stated in a cbs news release of 2-3-2023: "Now that the Covid-19 epidemic is in a different phase, the statistical office will switch to a lower frequency of news reports as of April 7. However, the mortality figures will continue to be published weekly via the CBS website and StatLine."
I just haven't been able to figure out exactly where those numbers are
Week 14 is now listed with 'final' figures. No more estimate for the week after that.
In the corona period, many sectors have fallen through the cracks: the government (politics and governance), science, healthcare, the judiciary, education (especially university), banks, large companies, the media and churches. Of course everything is mainstream, because on a small scale certain currents in each aforementioned sector kept their backs straight. However, the overall picture after a good 3 years is a plummeted trust in society: solidarity has snapped and it is now much more everyone for himself.
In my small circle 2 deaths, 1 and 3 days after the booster. Both were very healthy people. Another case with anaphylactic shock after the booster. I've seen horrific pictures of that. Furthermore, someone who has been 'lucky' with only one Tia. All these cases were not reported to the Lareb. My motto is and remains: you are a cow if you stunt with your health!
Another super article, Anton!
It's just staggering as there are still, for example, healthcare professionals who turn a blind eye to what's going on (intentionally or not, because I still can't figure that out. And perhaps the same is true for most people who work in the funeral industry, despite the evidence of excess mortality being abundantly clear?)
But of course, it's not just about so-called professionals. In my daily life I deal with "ordinary citizens" and the majority still firmly follow the narrative. Because of this, I now find it fighting against the beer quay to bring up something of WHATEVER that is not right. After all, those people are all about total denial; I experience this every week in the club life and I therefore do not start about anything (anymore). All I do now is express my own view of something when someone asks me something. Then I respond along the lines of, "Well, I don't know if that's the case." Or, "I see it differently because..." But I avoid "throwing bats in fowl pens", because then people will put their heels in the sand or look at you glassy, that's my experience.
And that they (want to) close their eyes to what is going on will have to do with the fact that the power of the MSM is unfortunately still very large. Because to be honest, the majority of Dutch people still "just" watch the Achtuurjournaal and talk shows such as Op1 and the like.
Still, I remain hopeful, as crazy as it sounds, that at some point the evidence will become SO vast that even the MSM will no longer be able to keep everything "under wraps." (No idea how long that will take !?!)
But for now, in this phase that is often so daunting, I think, it is therefore all the more admirable that there are people like you who do their best to keep bringing things to the attention. Therefore, once again, hats off to you, in this "crusade" for the truth!
You are an example to all of us, I think.
Thank you for the compliment.
Maybe you can send those people the link of onverklaardeoversterfte.nl. The tone there is a bit less activist – I hope so. Perhaps those who read that will smell fuse themselves.
I'm going through exactly the same thing when it comes to how people are looking at corona/the jabs right now. This after a shocking death 2 days after the jab of a healthy 20-year-old sportsman in my vicinity. Distressing! But start a conversation about excess mortality/vaccinations and get a listening ear, or at least an answer, ho but. The only thing that happens is that people (indeed) look a bit glassy, at most mumble something and then 'talk away'. Away topic, over to the order of the day. How do we get out of this? Surely there will be many others who have experienced something similar, especially given the dozens of deaths that have been kept under wraps by LAREB? Those people want to tell their story, don't they? How do we get this back on the map, partly in view of the fact that people are already talking about 2025 (!) for the corona policy evaluation. Again, admirable, Anton, your effort in this.
Super good article Anton... and thanks for that link. If I want to share something with people who don't know anything and they see virus varia, they immediately hit tilt....So that link is well thought out of you.
Indeed with teaspoon feeding
And yes about Campbell. I also have trouble finding people who are not in the msm or on wikipedia or framed by Maarten Keulemans.
Karol Sikora is someone you can still quote. He himself is not called a conspiracy theorist on wikipedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karol_Sikora
This reads very nicely. Informative, concise, not too complicated and perfect to introduce people to this topic without it being deterrent.
Thanks for all your work!