There is much to do about vaccine-related cancer. In addition to scientific studies on possible mechanisms by SV-401 SV40-promotorsequenties in vaccins, the IgG4 shift2 Scientific basis for the IgG4 discussion, weakening immune response and other mechanisms3 permanent changes in the functioning of immune cells by the MRNA coronavaccin , there are regularly serious alarm bells sound in alternative media4 The other newspaper: Cancer by mrna-pricking. Yesterday Pierre Capel told5The new world from around 9:30m About "side effects that will always remain". Just a tweet from Jan Bonte also came by6 Jan Bonte about possible carciogenic mechanisms And on the day I had ready this article, John Campbell posted a video entitled “Vaccine Cancer Mechanisms”7Campbell op youtube.
However, the authorities have been defringing us for years that there is nothing to be found in that direction. They point to the CBS data and confirm that. Support pillars cheer triumphantly that nothing is wrong. After all, CBS itself says: "Nothing to see here!" Reason to take a good look at the cause of death that is good for 28% of the deaths.
With the recent CBS data8 CBS Statline (xlsx here) We can make a graph up to 2024. Because we want to know something about cancer, we only show cancer in the following graphs.
One note in advance: they are the absolute numbers. The red -stamped trend line rises lightly because of the aging population. It was therefore not corrected in this case. In reality, the percentual mortality is falling. This is not relevant for this article, as we will see.
We zoom in strongly. Cancer is certainly not a seasonal disease, but there seems to be a kind of pattern. We mark the warmer months with sunny yellow (April-September). October-March remains snow white. (Donkey bridge)
To make the seasonal influences more visible, we give every month the average value of the months in the relevant "hot" (Jul) or cold (Jan) half year. That provides the following image:
We see here that the well -known raised "winter mortality" is not only caused by extra respiratory diseases. Or is it? That is always the dilemma of a doctor with a B form: what if this deceased heart patient had not picked up a virus? On the other hand: how serious would that flu have been if the patient had not been a heart patient? What is underlying, what is the cause of death? In the cold season, that choice occurs more often than in the summer. It is simply not an exact math in the medical sciences. The differences are not that great, but something strange happens.
Did the vaccinations against cancer death work?
The point of attention is the highly reduced cancer mortality in the winter of 2020-2021 (Legenda: "Jan-21") compared to other winters. The level was even lower (!) In that cold six months than most previous summers.
The second coronagolf was in full swing, the successful vaccination campaign was steaming.
We had already learned from the RIVM that the flu had failed thanks to the measures against Covid. According to exactly the same unscientific, invalid goalogics, the RIVM could have claimed very well in this case that the vaccine also worked against cancer. A missed opportunity to increase trust in the vaccines!
These findings suggest that the vaccines also help against cancer.
It seems that, where in normal winter seasons in the event of flu mortality, the underlying cancer was more often chosen, which worked very differently at Covid. They chose Covid unanimously, there is no doubt. That also means that the wave pattern could just as well come from arbitrary diagnostics in the cold periods as from actually increased cancer mortality. With related diseases that are related to each other, that must be much more difficult to distinguish.
The effect was further enhanced by the WHO instruction that for every cause of death formulier on which "Covid-19" was mentioned somewhere, COVID-19 had to be seen as a primary cause of death9 Vzinfo.nl: COVID Make primary cause of death .
This phenomenon may occur with more diseases. In that case, the excess mortality becomes even more religious. Because where are all those disappearance causes? All added to the Covid mortality, I suspect.
What is also striking is that after the vaccinations it actually seems to be better: the winters stick less above the trend line 2015-2019. Wonder vaccines!
Small correction: We miss more than 5% of the 2024 forms
In Table 2 of the CBS file We find exact information about non-reception cause of death forms10 See also: The mystery of the disappeared forms. Casable was around 1.2%. In 2015, 1.3%was missing, which in 2023 had practically tripled to 3.8%. In 2024 it will rise to no less than 7%. Whether it has been corrected for this is not included. In case they did not do that, I calculated the prognosis for them, based on those traditionally accepted 1.2% to 7% in December 2024. So those figures are not yet certain:
Go over it with your mouse to compare with the uncorrected figures (in Orange) on which CBS reports - albeit with the disclaimer that the figures can still be adjusted. But already loudly saying that nothing is wrong, then that is just in the market. Anyway: we look tense to the final figures!
Conclusion
We do not fall "massively". Provaxxers state that as a requirement, otherwise there is no reason to question the safety of the vaccines. As long as that "massively falling" does not happen, the wappie ruin remains. And here too (if that prognosis is about right) in the summer of 2024 is a difference of at most 100 people per month. There are not yet 600 extra in that half year. What will it be: 1000 a year? At 24,000 that of course does not mean anything.
At most, at most, 1000 grandparents, parents, daughters, sons, sisters, brothers ... less than 0.4% of the total cancer mortality! Oh no: 4%. Well, what are we talking about. And on the other hand there is a life -saving vaccine that has given hundreds of thousands a longer life! (cynicism off)
Just like with the cardiovascular disease, the question remains: What has that rise caused since mid -2021?
Sideline I: Cancer Diagnoses 30-44 years
2021 and 2022 were not encouraging years for the thirties/forties. In many other age groups, the diagnoses fell slightly.
How is it in 2024? Very or very bad? It's just which trend line you choose:
- 2015-2019 is the most favorable.
- 2015-2020 and 2010-2019 are close together11Note: Graph has been corrected, in the previous version those lines were virtually the same.
Source: Integral Cancer Center Netherlands12 Website IN
What turns out to be the case for years (I did not know): almost the number of women in that age group is told the diagnosis of “K”.
(And yet women are older than men ...)
Sideline I1: Heart and vessel disease
If we look at heart disease in the same way, we see much larger differences between winter and summer, up to 700 a month. Here a fairly low "Jan-21", perhaps a better disease to be diagnosed. And in the summer afterwards we see the previously described by Hans Verkendaart13 https://virusvaria.nl/sterfte-naar-doodsoorzaak-hart-en-vaatziekten/ trend break.
That "nothing is wrong" should be difficult to sustain, but as long as the quality media call it, it is true. Journalism should have been riding this tumor open.
References
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11Note: Graph has been corrected, in the previous version those lines were virtually the same
- 12
- 13
"We don't" massively ". Provaxxers state that as a requirement, otherwise there is no reason to question the safety of the vaccines. "
So seat belts no longer have to be. We do not fall "massively" if we don't wear a belt in the car.
Smoking idem ditto. Can you just continue or start. Most people do not fall over when they smoke.
Opiates can also be swallowed, sniffed or sprayed. Most of the drug users (whether or not legally with regard to painkillers prescribed by the doctor) do not die of opiates. Actually quite a safe tool, right?
Or drinking excessive alcohol: no problem, we don't die en masse.
Bungee jumping, parachuting, quietly driving orange, extra gas at red, oh why not either. We don't die en masse either.
Cancer is also peanuts. 45,000 cancer deaths per year in the Netherlands, which is less than 0.25% on a total of more than 18 million Dutch people. So we don't die en masse.
Most people survived the war during 40-45. So we can also experience quietly again, we do not fall en masse.
To kill Covid (just as deadly as a cold) but not ...
In healthcare they are now getting sick of themselves, I read at CBS. 1 in 12 (never so much absenteeism) is sick because of "flu" or "virus" (makes no sense to work) or just says honestly that they no longer feel like it ("burn out").
Drivers also get sick en masse, I read in the same article.
I call this: the golden cage syndrome
https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/nieuws/2025/24/ziekteverzuim-neemt-toe-in-eerste-kwartaal-2025
Gosh dramatically say. And you hear nothing from NL insurance companies (right?).
Ed Dowd has been swinging with insurance disasters for years, but otherwise ...
You have again made visually visible what is wrong with the CBS data: the data is incomplete and there is a misclassification.
It is shameful that Ruben van Gaalen makes a graph of this and releases interpretations. The data analysts of Statistics Netherlands should know better. Such mistakes can easily occur if they work with subjective data collection methods, such as causes of death forms.
What's the matter with those people?
Is it incompetence?
Are they (secret) regulations imposed from above, to keep sleeping dogs asleep?
Or are their brains perhaps hidden with IgG4 antibodies due to too many mrna pricks?
Or even worse, are they afraid of something?
Here the CBS makes the same mistakes as NIVEL in the investigation into the relationship between vaccination and excess mortality. It makes me despondent.
Very important that you put your finger on the sore spot every time.
Well ... you have written a whole book about it, and it continues to fascinate! Conspiracy or opportunism, for sale at Bol
I think it makes sense that many diseases, including cancer, go together with low vitamin D in the winter period. If I am not mistaken, Robert Clancy often talks about it at John Campbell.
It is not conceivable that only in Winter 20-21 high Vitd was and always low. The connection between those peaks and the winters gives the impression that both of them are due to Laag Vitd. For me it is more like misclassification, especially when you see how easy that goes in 20-21. It proves that it does not have much to do with Vitd.
https://youtu.be/vjpzvT8n1_M?si=KyZ5IsjSqFL1VgR6
In this video, Campbell provides an overview of possible explanations for a possible relationship between mrna vaccination and (turbo) cancer.
How coincidental! I added it to the introduction and the references. Thanks for the tip!
Wat wilde, cynische gedachten n.a.v. bovenstaande
Wat er door de (schouw)arts op het B formulier ingevuld wordt is denk ik sterk ‘modegevoelig’ en natte vinger werk.
Zie ook: https://youtu.be/mqkWOBJS4xY?si=xwWpq0YEj9HSBJ8o
Mogelijk dat het meer toeschrijven van doodsoorzaak aan nieuwvorming in de wintermaanden voortkomt uit impliciete redenatie bij artsen: overledene heeft griepprik gehad, griep kan het dus niet zijn dus zal het (bij geleidelijke verslechtering) wel (ipv longproblematiek) nieuwvorming geweest zijn (en bij b.v. acuter sterven hart/ vaat problematiek. Ik bedenk maar iets.).
Ten tijde van de covidmode voordat de geweldige erkende vaccinatie hier tegen op de markt kwam, zeg maar winter 2020/2021, werden de doden aan de covid toegeschreven en niet aan nieuwvorming.
Punt van zorg zou de aanhoudende oversterfte moeten zijn maar dit wordt vakkundig door onze politiek onafhankelijke instituten weggemoffeld onder, inderdaad, het mom van “het is niet massaal”.
Vermoed dat omdat dit m.n. vroegtijdige overlijdens betreft en niet het ‘dorre hout’ van ouderen en al kwetsbare (cf. Bulgarije) dat ondersterfte nog vele jaren op zich laat wachten (treedt pas op als we belanden op het tijdstip van de normaal verwachte sterftedatum van de vroeg overledenen). Overigens gaat het blijvend mRNA prikken van kwetsbaren (ook in VS onder Kennedy) waarschijnlijk wel nog steeds bovengenoemd, tijdelijk dor hout effect geven.
Maak waarschijnlijk nog wel wat redeneer fouten hierboven. Hoor het graag.
You express what I also describe more or less with that "moderate diagnostics". Indeed, "fashion-driven" is a good addition, Naatst Naatst.
I don't think we'll see that underput. It may be spread over decades. That disappears in the noise and in the slightly less likely to fall from mortality rates.
But it is waiting.
We hardly know how that goes. But I will not forget a case: my grandfather was nursed in the hospital, but even after many studies it was not clear what was going on. When he died there, and my mother asked the treating doctor what he was going to fill in as a cause of death on the form, he reacted evasively. My mother insisted and then he said, "Before my part." She never found out what he filled in, but that doctor committed suicide not long after ...
That disappears in the noise. I fear that this will disappear in the noise when I see what a law is coming and how much power that gives NATO. If they keep escalating, it could just be that there will be an even greater excess and they can then attribute it to the war. But maybe I have become too pessimistic. The government seems to frustrate everything. From doing business to having things.
What you call is not noise, that looks more like lover noise 🙂
By means of noise I mean: Suppose it is 5% more dead per year that would otherwise have died in the coming forty years, then you will receive an average of 5% / 40 on average in the coming decades per year, which is 0.125% per year. That is simply no longer measurable, for example if only because it persists 5% or reduces it slowly. It is indistinguishable.
Growing mortality is only clearly visible if it concerns people over 80 who will miss in the following six months (possibly also in the subsequent flu season) in the mortality figures. The "pull-forward" effect.