...or pay via paypal

cards

Reactions

Comments that are not related to the topic of discussion will be deleted. Always keep comments respectful and substantive.

14 Comments
  1. Alison

    With conspiracy theories, in my humble opinion, there are at least two flavors: conspiracy facts and "strawmen."
    A 'strawman' is a deliberately designed conspiracy hoax to deceive gullible people and then ridicule anyone who dares to raise conspiracy facts by accusing them of believing in 'strawmen'. Pizzagate was one such example.
    Man is a lying and conspiratorial being. As if the elite wouldn't do what teenagers already excel at...

    Reply
  2. French Moon

    Anton, Do you think people with power will ever be open? Don't power, manipulation and hidden agendas go hand in hand? Will the "smartest" ever be held accountable? I suspect not...

    Reply
    1. Anton (@infopinie)

      Not voluntarily, no one does. They have that right, even regulated by law, for one reason or another. You don't have to cooperate with your own condemnation. But whistleblowers, hackers, a leak, you don't know. And then they have to. But yes, a lot of question marks have also lingered around JFK, for example, so no guarantee that everything will be satisfactorily completed.

      Reply
  3. Leo Brybor

    "Critical thinkers who question the Covid-19 narrative do the same with other major narratives." – but you don't question the virus narrative. Apart. So, isn't that really critical thinking, is it?

    The only weapon is the vaccine. COVID-19 does not exist. Even the WHO does not have differential diagnostics for this and so it is not a "disease". Unless, of course, you also change that definition, as virologists have changed the definition of "isolation", or WHO the definition of "pandemic".

    All to make you believe that viruses exist. That is not the case. Wake up and don't get sucked into the chatter about lab leaks, infectious bioweapons, deep state and more. All details that distract from the biggest lie of all.

    Viruses do not exist.

    Reply
    1. Anton (@infopinie)

      Is there a good explanation somewhere why the revenue models would be so much better if it was not about viruses but about something else? (I still don't know exactly what then, lifestyle? environment?)
      Are pages as https://viralzone.expasy.org/9556 All fake according to you? There is agreement on these sequences, unlike, for example, the numerous meridian maps in alternative medicine.
      I have a report of excellent experiment that shows infections via aerosols. Because that is no longer an issue, I have never done anything with it. Maybe that will come, but as I said: little time.
      You asked earlier for that sampling from the air which would also not be possible, see this piece from more than two years ago. https://virusvaria.nl/hard-bewijs-van-infectieuze-aerosolen/
      If you accuse me of "bashing" again (not in this comment but earlier), I don't think I'm going to answer you anymore. No hard feelings though, go ahead because I understand your frustration, but I don't feel like having to deal with it that way every time and see it in the comments. It is also a different discussion, in itself quite a topic for an article.

      Reply
  4. JVI

    Interesting piece, but this is not correct:

    ..... The reason the House of Democrats went crazy and impeached Trump for a single phone call with Zelensky in Ukraine... is because they couldn't allow Trump to snoop around and investigate their Deep State proxy.
    Trump knew what they were hiding. Think bioweapons....

    Should be:
    The reason that the House of Representatives of the US Congress (then dominated by the democratic party) wanted to impeach Trump (second impeachment attempt) was that Trump was looking in Ukraine for incriminating material about the Biden family (especially regarding the activities / corruption of Hunter Biden) and Joe Biden would be a major competitor in the upcoming presidential election...

    As is well known, that attempt to impeach Trump (in the senate) failed. Then, even before the presidential election, incriminating material was indeed found on a discarded Hunter Biden laptop. At the time, this was unanimously dismissed by the Deep State and the MSM as a Russian manipulation attempt.

    Meanwhile, long after the presidential election, it is now acknowledged that the laptop information is indeed authentic, and that this disqualification by the Deep State and the MSM was rather an attempt at manipulation...

    1
    1
    Reply
    1. Anton (@infopinie)

      Yes, I thought so when I read it but I just wanted to post the translation, I am not a specialist on this and it remains to be guessed what exactly the considerations were. It must have all played a role and it fits together very precisely. Not just bioweapons. I've also put your comment in the text, thanks!

      Reply
    2. Leo Brybor

      Trump is not going to do anything for the people. That's a puppet of the same financiers.

      Reply
    3. Leo Brybor

      Why do people keep falling for the Trump hoax?

      Reply
  5. Leo Brybor

    @Anton: excuus, het was niet beledigend bedoeld.

    We wijken af van het onderwerp: virussen bestaan niet. Verdienmodellen zijn uit scope.

    Je beweert dat respiratoire besmetting bewezen is en ik vroeg je naar documentatie daarvoor. Ik ga je “bewijs” op https://sci-hub.ru/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.09.025 eens bekijken (dat is het volledige artikel voor https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712(20)30739-6/fulltext, waarnaar je linkt).

    Het eerste dat opvalt, is dat het hier een pre-proof artikel is. Is het wel ooit gepubliceerd? Ik ga er even induiken en ik kom erop terug. 😉

    Reply
  6. Leo Brybor

    @Anton:

    "Not voluntarily, nobody does. They have that right, even regulated by law, for one reason or another. You don't have to cooperate with your own condemnation. But whistleblowers, hackers, a leak, you don't know. And then they have to. But yes, a lot of question marks have also lingered around JFK, for example, so no guarantee that everything will be completed satisfactorily."

    You say "they have that right". Rights are privileges if they can be taken at random, as we have seen over the past three years. There is no longer a "legal system", if it ever existed.

    https://odysee.com/Government–The-Biggest-Scam-in-History–Exposed_backup:9

    Reply
  7. Leo Brybor

    @Anton: in het door jou aangehaalde onderzoek zien we bij Method het volgende:

    “Methods Air samples collected in the hospital room of two COVID-19 patients, one ready for discharge, the other newly admitted, were subjected to RT-qPCR and virus culture. The genomes of the SARS-CoV- 2 collected from the air and isolated in cell culture were sequenced.”

    Inmiddels is het bij jou neem ik aan ook bekend dat RT-PCR helemaal geen diagnostische test is. Een interessante kritische review van de hoax die ook PCR is (net als virussen) vind je op https://criticalcheck.wordpress.com/2022/05/08/pcr-and-real-time-rt-pcr-under-critical-review/.

    Over “cell culture”: weet je hoe virologen dergelijke celculturen prepareren?

    This research also proves nothing at all, but I have such an idea that you are not going to believe me, no matter what I use as an argument. I hope that one day you will find the time and the critical mindset to ask yourself: how do I even know that viruses exist? I was lucky to find that time about 2.5 years ago. Before that, I was also brainwashed to be afraid of invisible little enemies.

    A final reference that does not take much time (only 50 pages with large font 😉 ):

    https://odysee.com/DeBetoveringVerbreken:b, the Dutch (open source) translation of https://odysee.com/cowan-dr-tom-breaking-the-spell:c.

    Greeting
    Leo

    Reply
    1. Anton (@infopinie)

      For diagnosis of disease, the PCR test is certainly not suitable. That is also not claimed in the sentence you quote.
      But what I'm especially curious about: what about it? Is there a more conclusive alternative theory?

      Reply
  8. Leo Brybor

    @Anton: "were subjected to RT-qPCR" – it says that PCR was used to detect the virus. (RT-) PCR is not a test, it is a tool to multiply genetic material. Nothing more, nothing less. But I guess you don't read the article I sent with you anyway. 😉

    "What about it?" – what do you mean? Why do people get sick? At least not because of viruses. 🙂

    Behold https://odysee.com/@dharmabear:2/Dr-Thomas-Cowan-What-Makes-You-Sick-WAPF-Oct-22-2022:6.

    Reply

Post a Comment

Je e-mailadres wordt niet gepubliceerd. Required fields are marked with *