Yesterday I was really shocked. And at the same time, it made me a little sad. The world turned dark brown for a moment. I was sitting in an eatery in Amsterdam and a table away a rather obscure group had settled. They weren't ashamed of anything because I could just catch snippets of their shocking conversation. I couldn't understand it very precisely; In any case, they were only talking about corona.
At one point I caught a glitch: CBS would have ignored the Healthy Vaccine Effect and downplayed side effects. Well, I happen to know a little more about that because I'm not only on top of the quality media, but I also follow CBS on Twitter. So I immediately realized that those wappies were once again telling half the story about that Healthy Vaccine Effect. Ruben van Gaalen tweeted no less than last week twice iets over het Healthy vaccinee effect. Is dat 'negeren'!?
The Healthy Vaccinee Effect according to Statistics Netherlands (CBS)
"erg zieke, ongezonde mensen worden minder vaak gevaccineerd."
From a tweet by Ruben van Gaalen December 11, 2023
"mensen met andere aandoeningen [....] zijn extra gemotiveerd zich te laten vaccineren.
From a (re)tweet by Ruben van Gaalen December 12, 2023
En dan nog volhouden dat ze bij CBS niet zouden weten wat het Healthy Vaccinee Effect is...! Ruben van Gaalen ziet bovendien heel scherp dat het HVE niet per se ten gunste van de vaccins uitwerkt, zoals wappies vaak denken. Het ligt natuurlijk veel genuanceerder maar dat hoeven we hier niet uit te leggen en het CBS al helemaal niet want wij zouden het toch niet begrijpen.
Important side effects in vaccinated people, according to CBS/RIVM
Het CBS en het rivm zouden daarnaast ook de bijwerkingen van de coronavaccins ontkennen. Dat is natuurlijk net zo min waar en je ziet hoe makkelijk binnen zo'n wappie-bubbeltje een tunnelvisie ontstaat. Het tegendeel is namelijk het geval. CBS en rivm benadrukken juist de overdaad aan bijwerkingen!
Stel je even voor: Je organiseert als overheid prik- en communicatiecampagnes voor een vaccin dat helder gedefinieerd is, "uit en te na" onderzocht en dat nauwgezet wordt gemonitord door flatgebouwen vol ambtenaren met als uiteindelijk zeer specifiek doel: ”de ander beschermen" "Protecting Yourself" "het bestrijden van Serious Covid" en niets anders, dat was van meet af aan helder. Dankzij de veiligheid en de effectiviteit kon de overheid vol op het orgel en het is dat Hugo de Jonge zich fatsoenlijk inhield want eigenlijk had de vaccinatie verplicht moeten worden gesteld, ook aan anti-vaxxers. Dat gebeurde niet. Omdat we in een gaaf land leven werd er alleen maar gedreigd dat ze bijvoorbeeld hun baan konden kwijtraken, of hun sociale leven - of beide of iets anders ook nog. Ze waren volledig vrij om daarvoor te kiezen!
Two years after the first campaign, you then do research and guess what? Plenty of side effects! These are all unforeseen, unintended and therefore surprising side effects on a variety of conditions. The report shows that the vaccinations have not only prevented corona deaths, but also reduced mortality from other causes of death thanks to these side effects. They could see that by comparing vaccinated people with unvaccinated people. Being vaccinated resulted in completely unpredicted differences in a variety of diseases. If those aren't side effects!
Side effects for unvaccinated people, according to CBS/RIVM
An important side effect of the jab was that those who did not get vaccinated were more likely to die than before. And no: not because of Covid. Anti-vaxxers suddenly started dying more often from anything and everything, from the moment sensible citizens protected themselves and stayed at about the same level. Compare the two green lines. Blue is also allowed, those are the nursing homes.
Since mid-2021, non-covid deaths among people who have not been vaccinated have more or less doubled. You can't see exactly when that was on the horizontal axis, but it must have taken a very long time. So what do we learn from this?
The side effects do not only concern those who have been vaccinated but also indirectly those who have not received a vaccination. Indirectly, the anti-vaxxers benefited, but the side effects were less effective for them because they were not vaccinated. It's your own fault. Vaccinations have influenced the dynamics in society in a way that we don't yet fully understand. It wasn't postponed care, just to name a few. It should have affected the jabbed as well. No: it was definitely the vaccines. The simultaneity is decisive.
The vociferous group agreed that such effects indicate that a study is incorrect. But if you read the report yourself, I would say: CBS/RIVM have researched it precisely to leave nothing to chance and to get ahead of this kind of nonsense. The proof that this is how it really works has now been delivered!
Case closed
Both the excess mortality debate and the parliamentary inquiry have thus been rendered superfluous. ZonMW could actually stop the barrage of tangentially related studies. This was it. The Word has been spoken. Laypeople in the House of Representatives and beyond can be complicated with each other about the recent reports, but the research is there anyway, initiated and fully paid(!) by our own government, a government to which a large part of the population sometimes owes up to five or six completely free(!) injections. Homage!
De onverwachte vaccin-effecten, ook wel 'bijwerkingen' genoemd, pakken zonder uitzondering allemaal goed uit. Een hoogleraar kansberekening kan vast uitrekenen hoe onvoorstelbaar veel mazzel we daarmee hebben gehad. RIVM/CBS maakt ons duidelijk hoe we door het oog van de naald zijn gekropen met die positieve effecten. In het verleden waren er immers eigenlijk voornamelijk negatieve bijwerkingen ('adverse events') waar mensen ziek van werden of aan overleden. Dat lijkt voorgoed voorbij dankzij de mRNA-technologie, het nieuwste wonder van de moderne wetenschap met ongeplande uitsluitend positieve bijwerkingen ('serendipitous events').
Research quality explained
Methodologically and statistically, it's all right. CBS and RIVM are Institutes, aren't they? They don't fall into those kinds of traps. They know very well that statistics are only good if several independent research parties with access to the crucial data go through everything thoroughly and unbiased. This has now been done by having both the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) and Statistics Netherlands (CBS) look at it: both research institutes operate independently of each other.
In de statistiek kan het dus niet zitten. De enige verklaring voor de spectaculaire resultaten zit in de medische hoek. Aan de cijfers wordt door de 'hoofdstroom' aan artsen en mediamakers niet getwijfeld dus dan is het waar, volgens de methodiek van topjournalist Tijs van den Brink, die voor alle zekerheid Ab Osterhaus nog even kan invliegen. De consensus is bereikt. Hoe het vaccin precies werkt, dat weet verder nog niemand, maar dát het werkt, dat zie je aan de correlaties. De statistische verbanden zijn onmiskenbaar.
Het overheidsonderzoek toont aan dat er een vaccin is uitgerold waarvan nu blijkt dat men vooraf nog geen idee had van al het goede dat het vaccin zou brengen: hoe het werkte, of het door het lichaam zou gaan en waar, hoe lang het welke effecten zou hebben... Allemaal verrassingen: Blije Bijwerkingen!
Onderzoek naar een relatie tussen enerzijds het vaccin, met alle bevestigde onvermoede blije bijwerkingen, en anderzijds de oversterfte is overbodig geworden omdat één ding nu als een paal boven water staat: "het is zeker niet het vaccin", alle obducties en microbiologische bewijsvoering ten spijt. Het staat zelfs in de krant.
Further research is a waste of money that could be better spent on research into viruses that mainly cause neurological damage. According to Ron Fouchier, there is still a whole lot of fallow. I hope he's already secretly working on it!
Bonus: Correcting for HVE and Protection
In a previous article, we compared the vaccination coverage of the population with the vaccination coverage among hospital patients based on data from the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM). It was at a similar level. See this chart.
But is the vaccination coverage of the population actually a good reference for the vaccination coverage you can expect in the hospital?
If you take into account the Healthy Vaccinee effect (sick/unhealthy people are vaccinated less), you would expect a lower vaccination rate among patients in the hospital. Then about 5% of each blue bar is immediately removed.
Well, this is also what it's all about coronapatients who have been vaccinated against corona. Then we would expect that the majority of those vaccinated will NOT end up in the hospital thanks to the vaccine protection.
De Volkskrant claimde vorig jaar nog "bijna drie keer minder kans op ziekenhuisopname" bij 60-plussers.
Dezelfde krant kwam deze week opnieuw met een spectaculaire scoop: "70% minder opname van gevaccineerden bij ouderen".
Wow. They are on top of the news and keep us well informed with always relevant updates.
Uit dit laatste bericht blijkt opnieuw dat de wetenschappers werd verrast door de opvallend goede werking van hun experiment. In de trials vielen de resultaten kennelijk nog wat tegen maar in de praktijk...! Wauw. De vaccin als toverbal. Je kiest in de winkel een blauwe, je zuigt er even op en hij is nog blauwer. Wie had dat ooit gedacht.
Let's keep it quiet for a while and once, very conservatively, keep one-third improvement, then the expectation of admissions drops by a third. If we adjust the blue forecast accordingly, the graph becomes as follows:
If we were to look at the headline used by the RIVM itself: "Three-quarters less likely to be admitted to hospital after corona repeat vaccination". Then all the blue rods will be half as long as they already are.
So that would be more likely to warrant a headline if
"Hospital admissions vaccinated 4x higher than expected".
Now, of course, that can't be right. So we just have to wait for the next thorough analysis of the institutes, then it will probably be all right again.
We can enter the new year with confidence!
Kudos for this patriotic article. Hooray!!
With such constructive writing, we can face the future with confidence... Perhaps we should even ban other types of articles, but at least push them into the background and ignore them.
Sure enough, my reassured heart makes my heart flow the blood faster through the veins again.
My gratitude is infinite. Three cheers!
We can celebrate raising a glass to a safe and effective 2024 Arnoud!
🍻
While the rest of the world is finding that the mRNA 'vaccines' carry all kinds of risks, the genius Hugo, aided by his expert successor Dr Kuipers, has managed not only to force absolutely safe batches from the pharmaceutical companies, but even to stock up on a variant that makes people healthier. Homage!
No contamination with unintentional DNA residues during the production process. A production process that is completely different from the way the test batches were produced. No unexpected production of proteins of which no one yet knows what the consequences are. And the LNPs stay at the injection site! The Netherlands is the only country where the LNPs comply with the agreement. So no unexpected explosion of spike proteins throughout the body, no weird inflammation, no impairment of the immune system.
Everything is right again, Anton. In recent years, we have had an expert government that has the best interests of its citizens at heart. I'm back on the straight and narrow.
Good to know that the excess mortality is not caused by the 'vaccines', but by 'something else'. That gives the citizen courage.
Yes, Hugo de Jonge has sown seeds at his ministry (VWS) and how! He himself has disappeared, but his ghost still haunts the place. https://www.telegraaf.nl/nieuws/1643723357/fnv-onveilige-en-giftige-werksfeer-op-ministerie-vws
Do you know anything about the story of Geert vandenBossche? The new variant, the newest, will affect vaccinated people with all the consequences that entails. My partner's colleagues are already panicking even without this story, they are testing positive and it's only about corona. Those people have had several injections but are apparently still afraid. If what Geert vandenBossche warns about is true, then that fear is justified, but you can't say that of course. As long as they leave us alone!
The latest coronavirus variant is JN.1. First observed last September. and already dominant in large parts of the USA. According to the WHO, this variant will not lead to more hospitalization or deaths. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/new-covid-variant-jn-1-cases-cdc-new-york-new-jersey/
We'll see if we're going to be right: Geert Vandenbossche or the WHO.
Thanks for this very good article!
The deception of the people is too sad for words.
In the UK, they are also already working on the actual figures. Eventually, many people will become so ill that the population will no longer be able to close their eyes to reality.
By that time, total control is already in place. And the majority of them still don't realize that. The other dormant part thinks this is absolutely necessary 'because of the climate'.
It is interesting to download the tables of 3.3.3.1 and 3.3.2.1 from the report. Based on these tables, you can calculate what the population is in the various categories. (WLZ vaccinated, WLZ unvaccinated, other vaccinated and other unvaccinated.)
According to these tables, there are about 1 million people in the WLZ. Really 230000. (in 2022)
According to the tables, there are then 15 million people who are not in the WLZ.
Maybe they took out the people under 18 but I can't find that in the report. According to the tables, we have a vaccination rate of 92% in the long-term care institutions. And 90% for the rest.
Am I now suspicious if I think that they want to make the number of unvaccinated people as small as possible, to make the number of deaths per 100000 people as large as possible.
Certainly interesting, I don't have the time at the moment but I will pass on your suggestion to some kindred spirits.
Astonishing figures, I hear. Even the size of the population goes down and up by the week, and not just a little bit. This also applies to the number of (un)vaccinated people... To be continued.
Those numbers have stirred something up... It's not very good.