Panic at CBS leads to lies for good

VWS: What the state propaganda claims

(Below was one of the tweets with state lies. These have since been removed, as the government is trying to remove more evidence of their evil incompetence.)

https://twitter.com/ministerVWS/status/1585199710964396032

It said:

Alle 12+'ers kunnen nu een afspraak maken voor de#herhaalprik. That is wise, because the repeat prick...
➡️ reduces the risk of serious illness
➡️ reduces the chance of passing on the virus
➡️ seems to reduce the risk of long-term complaintshttps://t.co/ssgEZQJFyT

— Ernst Kuipers (@ministerVWS)October 26, 2022

VV: What happens scientifically

Younger than 60 is next up to 12+. One Pre-print study of John Ioannidis, Stanford University mentions the IFR of SARS-CoV-2. What mortality risk does each age group have?

• 50-59 years: mortality rate 0.129%
• 40-49 years: mortality rate 0.035%
• 30-39 years: mortality rate 0.011%
• 20-29 years: mortality rate 0.003%,
  survival rate 99.997%
• 0-19 years: mortality rate 0.0003%,
  survival rate 99.9997%

For children, the risk of death is negligible, as is the likelihood of serious illness.

The median IFR is around 0.03% for 0-59 years and 0.07% for 0-69 years. This applies to 70-year-olds, which is 94% of the world's population.

"We weten dit al heel lang, maar regeringen gaan door en veroorzaken ellende bij mensen met gevolgen die waarschijnlijk tientallen jaren of langer zullen duren om te herstellen."

Dr. Paul Alexander, former advisor to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS Canada)

VV: In week 42 (17 to 23 Oct) more than 3300 people died, almost 450 more than expected for this week. The excess mortality that has persisted for a year is steadily increasing, not only among the over-65s.

CBS: Mortality among WLZ care users, such as residents of nursing homes and care institutions for the disabled, increased slightly, for the rest of the population this remained about the same as the week before. In both groups there is excess mortality.

VV: Both among WLZ care users, such as residents of nursing homes and care institutions for the disabled, and among the rest of the population, the excess mortality has been showing an uninterrupted upward trend for more than half a year. Increased and unexplained mortality was reported in the summer of 2021 and continues to this day.

The first injections were made more than a year and a half ago. A year ago, there were 30 unexplained deaths a day. We are currently over 60. If that continues, there will be 20,000 on an annual basis. Young people are increasingly starting to count in the excess mortality statistics. It shouldn't be.

CBS: Mortality among over-80s remained roughly the same as the week before, while mortality among people under the age of 80 increased slightly. There is excess mortality in every age group.

VV: Among people over 80, excess mortality remains high, among people under the age of 80 the excess mortality is even increasing. In both groups, excess mortality even exceeds the weekly margins.

CBS: Cause of death data for the past few months will follow; these are known until June 2022.
-~5000 people have already died from C19 until June
-There was a flu epidemic for 13 weeks from the end of March
-There was a heat wave in July See further: (link to previous tweet)

VV: Of the deceased, it cannot be accurately determined without an autopsy whether the cause of death is related to, for example, (after) effects of Covid or of the vaccination. The effect of the heat wave peak is easy to isolate as well as the flu epidemic. Whether the flu epidemic with healthy immune systems would have had as much impact as it does now is disputed by immunologists. On OurWorldinData, 1400 confirmed Covid deaths have been reported from Jan through June 2022. Statistics Netherlands (CBS) reports 5,000.
I use OWID because Ruben van Gaalen also refers to graphs from OWID. OWID uses RIVM data. So there is a reference to rivm data if that is the case, but in its own country CBS throws a factor of 4 over that when it concerns Covid mortality.

CBS: Cumulative excess mortality per million inhabitants since 1/2020. Mortality in Singapore, Norway, Australia, Denmark, especially New Zealand long-term (very) low.

Singapore

Because Singapore has known so little Covid, mortality is now attributed to after-effects of undiagnosed Covid. It cannot be anything else because the country has a high vaccination rate. So the conclusion is: people have not noticed that they got it and are only now dying from it.

I can't help but see this as the desperate lifting of cognitive dissonance. The same thing is happening in Australia and New Zealand.

Norway

Noorwegen is inderdaad een wonder. Noren hebben nauwelijks enige Covid gehad en leken ook ongevoelig voor de prikken. Dat daar niet een delegatie heen is gegaan om te onderzoeken wat ze daar anders doen dan hier... Meer levertraan eten? Ventilatieparagraaf in het Bouwbesluit aanpassen op goed geïsoleerde panden?

But that's where things go wrong too:

In Norway, an increased mortality rate of more than 10 percent has been recorded so far this year.

"Dit is meer dan we hadden verwacht. De cijfers zijn deels onverklaarbaar" zegt demograaf Anders Sønstebø van Statistics Norway.

NRK (Norwegian Broadcasting Cooperation)

The next day there is a government article in the same newspaper. The Norwegian Directorate of Health and Social Affairs states that vaccines have nothing to do with excess mortality.

"We've had a low mortality rate during the pandemic. Those who have not yet been affected by the pandemic have aged and thus become more vulnerable." Gelooft hij het zelf? Hoe zit het dan in landen met hogere covidsterftecijfers, is daar geen oversterfte?

Denmark

Denemarken volgens CBS: "sterfte: (zeer) laag" - nou.. groen=laag, rood=hoog. Getoonde periode: vanaf voorjaar 2021.

Vergeleken met het begin van de vaccinaties is de sterfte in NL toegenomen met 109,56 per 100.000. In Denemarken is de sterfte in dezelfde periode gestegen met 100,77. Dat scheelt 8,79 per 100.000 ofwel 0,009 procentpunt. Als dat nou een succesverhaal moet zijn... De lijnen vertonen een nagenoeg parallelle stijging.

New Zealand

Mortality in NZ is even lower than in China, where the government is also the only reliable Source of Truth. I found a combined graph AUS and NZ. Is Omikron deadly there? That wave lasts an insanely long time. Or is it something else, or a combination of both?

[later inserted, 28-03-2023:]

CBS: Recentere oversterfte in NL, ook in veel andere landen, mogelijk deels uitgestelde sterfte van kwetsbaren, die langdurig (in 2020+2021) beschermd werden door vaccins en 'veilig thuis blijven' en uiteindelijk toch met nieuwe interacties tegen een virus aanlopen of vallen.

VV: CBS oppert dat de kwetsbaren bij wie de bescherming goed heeft gewerkt, alsnog omvallen als ze uit hun gevangenis worden bevrijd. Wat een maatregel was dat dan...
Statistics is a profession in its own right.

CBS: It has now also been shown that corona recoverers, who were already vulnerable, had an increased risk of dying AFTER recovery. In Singapore (with very good test data), all excess mortality was directly or indirectly related to Covid-19. report-on-excess-mortality-during-the-covid-pandemic-18sep2022.pdf

VV: Dit slaat toch wel alles. Het is een paniekreflex om de vaccins buiten schot te houden bij de onverklaarde oversterfte. "Als mensen een SADS (plotselinge dood) krijgen dan zullen ze toch wel Covid hebben gehad waardoor ze extra kwetsbaar zijn geworden." Dat is de redenatie in het rapport met de 'zeer goede testdata'. De laatste 'P.S.'-tweet poogt deze blunder overigens wat weg te poetsen.

Bulgaria was doing very well until December 2020. But on January 1, 2021 it already had (before the vaccination backlog) a three times as high excess mortality as the Netherlands, so to use that country as a reference seems a bit shabby to me. Derrie-picking. I can do that too, mind you.

"Waar meer geprikt is dan hier", ik ben ze even doorgelopen. Het ooit zo bewierookte Portugal, toen voorland met de hoogste vaccinatiegraad, doet het slechter dan wij. Dan hebben we bv. Italië, België, UK, Oostenrijk... Hieronder de sterfte in die landen.

Eénderde van de landen met een hogere vaccinatiegraad dan Nederland doet het slechter qua oversterfte. Dus 'waar meer geprikt is, nauwelijks, geen oversterfte', dat is de overheidscommunicatie die ons vertrouwen moet inboezemen.

CBS: So: mortality patterns shaken up.
-Despite measures, excess mortality, was/is largely easily explainable, there is also a lot of occurrence!
-Possible long-term effects (e.g. delayed care) and effect of the virus (also after recovery) that have not yet been worked out: research needed.

VV: If you blow away the smokescreen, there is a consistent mortality pattern. Almost everywhere people are struggling with excess mortality and are making frantic attempts to find explanations. As in Scotland, the vaccines are not taken into account because they are safe and effective. (source)

Countries without deferred care, countries that are/were proud that they could continue to function, see the same excess mortality so that cannot be a sufficient explanation. If deferred care is a factor, it is certainly not a decisive factor, even if you calculates what effect it could have.

CBS: PS: Het woord 'aangetoond' is vwb oversterftestudie uit Singapore wat sterk, maar er was dus geen "overige oversterfte" (naast C19) onder niet-recent herstelden, wel onder recent herstelden. Deze studie komt meer in richting aangetoond. Meer studies nodig. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-05325-5

Singapore shows that excess mortality is even attributed to Covid in countries that served as an example of how well vaccinations worked against Covid.

Statistician van Gaalen mentioned that Covid recoverers had an increased risk of death AFTER recovery. That was not correct or again lied to, anyway: disinformation. There is a study that vaccination breaks down the previously acquired natural immunity. He probably doesn't mean that study.

He mentions here a study that is better in the direction. It seems that he did not read it but was given as a suggestion by someone who pointed out his Singapore blunder to him. Some quotes from the study that come in the better direction::

"Natuurlijk besmette populaties hadden minder kans op herinfectie met SARS-CoV-2 dan de infectie-naïeve en gevaccineerde personen."

"Het significant hogere infectiepercentage bij infectie-naïeve deelnemers dan bij patiënten die eerder met SARS-CoV-2 waren geïnfecteerd, wijst op een mogelijke bescherming door natuurlijke infecties."

"Onze gegevens konden de vaccinatiestatus niet correleren met ziekenhuisopname en varianten"
Ze zagen dus geen effect van vaccinaties op ziekenhuisopnames. Ze beweren dat ze dat niet konden meten want dat wilden ze dan per variant uitsplitsen en daarvoor waren er te weinig data... Waarom dan niet zonder uitsplitsing rapporteren, dat geeft in elk geval een indruk.

I sense from that study that natural immunity is far superior in all areas. Hospitalizations after vaccination have not been reported. Nowadays you have to read between the lines in scientific publications.