I've updated my Netflix scenario. Version 2.0 of the Previous synopsis of June 2021. So the same concept with some new elements added, fitting seamlessly. The first paragraphs are largely taken from the June 2021 version. Do you have any additions to the storyline for Nepflix? Let us know in the comments, turned on below this article for the occasion.
A scenario that answers questions
Why I have come to find the Gain-of-Function debate interesting is that this 'narrative' (because that is what it is: a coherent story) can be a supporting explanation for the incomprehensible hyperreaction of the WHO, the NHI (National Health Institute), Fauci and the institutions and governments collaborating with them.
The Lab Leak theory seems like fodder for conspiracy scenarios, but it is the opposite: conspiracy scenarios are consigned to the realm of fables. At Lab Leak, an accident is the cause of the misery, with all the hysterical attempts to cover up that accident. That is really something different from virus spread as the first step of a preconceived plan by a power-hungry elite.
Episode 1: "Oops"
Some American scientific institutes maintain politically undesirable ties with China in order to continue research that is very difficult to do in the West. The Obama administration banned Gain of Function (GoF) research in America, after which they turned to China for virus research.Wuhan Institute of Virology. GoF research experiments with the infectiousness and/or lethality of viruses.
If a few sick people are spotted around the lab in Wuhan, it attracts the attention of employees and virologists of the Wuhan lab. [This can be imagined by an infected employee in the lab lighting his family, as far as I'm concerned, that can be done right in the first episode. Just to point out that it's fiction.]
Het betreffende virus wordt al snel herkend. "Shit - it's ours...".
All alarm bells are going off. Not only with regard to the health risks, but especially for keeping the GoF investigation and the American-Chinese cooperation in it under the radar, including with the Chinese army. That's wrong. This must be suppressed immediately and ruthlessly at all costs, those involved agree, the virologists and pharmaceutical companies are unanimous. Pharmaceuticals? Certainly, because the official goal of the research was to have vaccines ready in time in the event that a dangerous virus jumped from animals to humans...
The mood is depressed for a while, but a ray of hope appears: if they do it smartly, they might get the FDA on board, because of course they are also involved, which has financed. And so is the U.S. government. That offers hope.
Still in doubt about labelak? readthis piece by Nicholas Wade.) and/orAsk Marion (3) (janbhommel.com)and view the bibliography there. A phrase from that article:
“[A lableak would] could mean for virology as a field what the nuclear disasters in Harrisburg and Chernobyl meant for nuclear energy'.”
Exit virological research.
There is a threat of loss of face for the Chinese, FDA and therefore America, and not least for the virology sector. To avoid the possible appearance of an escaped lab virus and thus avoid international embarrassment, thorough precautions are being taken by the government.
Databases are being deleted. Areas are cordoned off. Under no circumstances should the virus spread further, so even the strictest measures are still inadequate, according to those involved. Imagine that the virus is sampled and examined elsewhere and strange things are discovered in it... Everything really has to be done.
Inform those involved
The first fellow virologists who are contacted are understanding and happy to help, because if the link with the Wuhan lab is made, oops-oops. In China, too, the heaviest means are being used to prevent the spread of the virus, up to and including lockdowns. China should not be blamed for this fumbling with the Americans.
In Amerika begrijpt Fauci het gevaar. Hij weet heel goed dat er onderzoek wordt gedaan dat de randjes opzoekt, daarom financiert hij het via-via met hulp van een relatie, Peter Daszak. Men zou eens kunnen denken dat het experimenteren met samengestelde virussen als "gain-of-function" onderzoek was bedoeld. Dat er toevallig een superbesmettelijk dodelijk virus uit voort zou komen was weliswaar niet de intentie maar ja, kon ook niet worden uitgesloten. Het waren immers experimenten, die doe je om dingen te weten te komen.
Fauci is mobilizing the sectors involved. They agree that this must be stopped at all costs. They pull out all the stops. Directed publications, even in authoritative medical journals (Nature Medicine), appear in which the lab-leak theory is consigned to the realm of fables.
Fauci is not the only one who knows how to make the link, see also Marion Koopmans in a special broadcast of the Jeugdjournaal.
The WHO is also informed by the Chinese, their largest sponsor. Of course, WHO officials had heard something about it in the corridors, but really...? Of course they are scared to death too. Out of self-preservation they decide to participate. The world simply needs a WHO! Especially when accidents happen. And besides, this could also mean for the WHO what Chernobyl was for nuclear energy. They should have known and monitored this. The WHO informs their other major source of WHO income, the pharmaceutical companies. Fortunately, they appear to already be aware. It's a small world.
GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), with a facility in Wuhan, is a major shareholder in Pfizer. Pfizer is working on the vaccines to be able to use them quickly against modified/mutated viruses and therefore already has a few things in-house. The good intention was really to have life-saving, quickly adaptable vaccines ready if new dangerous viruses emerge.
Communication strategy
Then they have to choose. Are we going to publicize this or not? The contagiousness soon makes it clear that there is no stopping it. So there must be a test as soon as possible to be able to signal where the virus is rearing its head so that a lockdown can be quickly imposed where necessary. After all, that's what the Chinese do.
Pfizer sends the necessary technical information about the most recent virus to the WHO, which passes it on to Drosten (and possibly Koopmans, not knowing that Koopmans is aware of the Wuhan research through her own Erasmus lab). However, this does not need to be made public. How can it be justified that they were able to develop a test so quickly for a novel virus from an unknown source? They write in their paper that they found that on Twitter... Seriously.
“Before public release of virus sequences from cases of 2019-nCoV, we relied on social media reports announcing detection of a SARS-like virus. We thus assumed that a SARS-related CoV is involved in the outbreak.”
(source: justification of the RT-PCR test of a.o. Koopmans and Drosten) Sounds solid, doesn't it?
While bioNTech's 2019 annual report states that the pre-clinical research of that vaccine (later called the Covid-19 vaccine) had been completed and the Phase 1 study was well underway! For a virus that only emerged in December 2019? That is alert, not to say foresight! See page 6 of the BioNTech Annual Report 2019:

Emphasizing seriousness
So that's the story. They knew nothing, they were robbed. It all sounds a bit exaggerated for a serious flu virus, so how do they ensure that it is really strictly monitored? By exaggerating the seriousness a bit. Fortunately, stories from China are easy to organize. Neil Ferguson sets out to work on serious-sounding models, he has previously shown that he has a special talent for this. It is not without reason that Imperial College called itself 'the favorite research partner' of the Chinese. So the lethality is greatly exaggerated. An IFR of 3.4% is assumed. After all, afterwards they can always say 'better safe than sorry'. They had no idea what it would bring about.
Unwilling Pharmacists
Pfizer en andere farmaceuten worden intussen onder druk gezet om vaccins uit te rollen. Dat weigeren ze: ze zitten nog midden in onderzoeken, het vaccin is nog lang niet klaar. Ze willen helemaal nog niet marketen, want onvoldoende getest, proefdieren reageren niet goed na een aantal maanden etcetera. De overheden en WHO zetten de farmaceuten echter op allerlei manieren onder zware druk. [Ik laat dit graag aan de scriptschrijvers over] "Dan kort je je de testperiode maar wat in." Ze zijn ten einde raad. Dit mag absoluut geen drama worden want overheden, veiligheidsorganisaties, medici, farmaceuten - ze zitten allemaal in hetzelfde schuitje en dat mag niet zinken. Maar de farmaceuten zien de bui al hangen als hun vaccin niet naar behoren werkt. Dat gaat ze geld kosten. De overheden bieden In hun radeloosheid uiteindelijk afzetgarantie en volledige vrijwaring van alle mogelijke schadeclaims. En bij een volgende gelegenheid zal de voorkeur niet uitgaan naar de weigeraars. De farma gaat dan toch maar akkoord, eigenlijk een ideale deal! De FDA zegt toe zich coöperatief op te stellen bij de toelating.
The pharmaceutical companies are now very interested in getting their injections approved for children. Then filing claims for damages becomes even more difficult. If the drug is approved for children, adults (under US law) can no longer claim vaccine damage. The reasoning is that childhood vaccines are so harmless that adult claims can never be admissible. At least says attorney Robert Kennedy Jr..
Testing is underway in Europe and after some fiddling with apps in various countries, the EU has the idea that their Digital ID initiative could get a boost with this (also in combination with vaccination). It also fits beautifully into the plans they've discussed in the World Economic Forum's discussion groups.

On Bourla's advice, Ursula makes calls to European government leaders. Rutte and De Jonge are eager to take a leading role in this. Rutte excitedly explains to Hugo how they can profile themselves - in the national interest of course - in the EU context, partly using the WEF network. (I will save the advantages and disadvantages of the QR pass for a separate post, that would be too much here.) Another unique 'window of opportunity'! The Netherlands as the center of Europe when it comes to IT, innovation, leadership, hi-tech guide country, in short, the shining example for the world. As a small country you cannot offer much else, so you have to grab such an opportunity with both hands. Our EU envoys pledge to do everything in their power to have that QR pass accepted.
Het vervolg kennen we, daar zitten we nog steeds middenin. Als ze de QR-pas moeten opgeven, falen ze in de ogen van de EU en -en dat vinden ze misschien nog erger- in de ogen van het WEF. ("Dear Mark, can you please find anuzzer bag to walk arount wis?"). Overal valt het 'coronatoegangsbewijs' om. Als laatste in Nederland. En het was in de basis zo'n goed idee...
take off
Ze hebben de glazen ingegooid van hun eigen "vindo of opportunitie". Ze hebben de druk te hoog opgevoerd, gemanipuleerd, gefraudeerd, data gemanipuleerd, valse beloftes gedaan, gedreigd met gefabriceerde cijfers om hel en verdoemenis te kunnen prediken.
The doctors protected their shop, the politicians were frightened and then saw an escape from their fear in the form of an unprecedented leap forward. Can that cost something? Yes, that may cost something. The pharmaceutical companies were subservient and filling their pockets. The vax/pas combination was crowned the Only Way Out, even though that meant sacrificing human lives because effective home medicines had to be banned. Vitamin D remained out of the picture. The virus was not allowed to be spread through the air, only through 'droplets'. This is to avoid attention to ventilation, a cheap epidemic stopper. After all, any other way out did not lead to the QR pass and that would make everything better. Maxima thought so too.
Unfortunately, no one anticipated the prevailing incompetence. For example, virologists appeared to have little expertise and politicians confused coercion with strategic communication. This is partly why things have gotten so out of hand: insofar as a virus can be combated ad hoc, everything has been done wrong. The test showed no infection, lockdowns had an adverse effect on mortality, other measures made matters worse rather than better because virology had no idea about virus transmission while Maurice de Hond tried to provide all the studies on this. But how do you combine that with a QR pass... In the meantime, politicians are splitting society to get everyone on the same page: the pass. Forgetting that the people of the Netherlands still thought they were part of a democracy.
The Dutch virodrama
Because of the code of silence, it was not possible to work scientifically and the civil servants/scientists got bogged down in their own groupthink, which was converted into mass formation by the people via the cabinet/media. And if that virus was to be effectively controlled, what was to be done with those vaccine contracts? After all, they had been signed - some of them had been confronted with because Ursula had signed them on behalf of all EU countries - and without those vaccines, the coercive means to get people to get the QR pass would lapse. So I went ahead to the only way out with a pass.
One country after another is now stopping, the Netherlands is failing to act as a leading role model and the government is making itself the rise of the world. Ursula van der Leyen tried to save some money by discussing vaccination obligations, as the Pfizer boss had tipped her off in a text message (she got the number from her husband, who is the CEO of a competitor of Pfizer, and also an mRNA specialist. He also thought it was a very good plan.)
En tussen dit alles door spelen nog de familiebanden van de Jonge met de farmacie, Omtzigt met het WEF, coronagezant Sijbesma met weer een andere farmaceut, belangenverstrengeling van OMT-leden met patenten, farmaceuten en testfaciliteiten, de macht van Grapperhaus over het hof, de WHO-club met Koopmans die op onderzoek ging in hun eigen Wuhan-lab ("Nee, zag er keurig uit"), rivm en CBS die worden verondersteld hun eigen functioneren en output te gaan onderzoeken. Er dus vanuit gaand dat ze normaal gesproken maar wat doen. En alles tegen de achtergrond van enorme onnodige sterfte, een instortende volksgezondheid en economie, verstoorde kinderjaren, een verscheurde samenleving en verschrompeld vertrouwen in overheid, rechtsstaat, media en medische sector.
Je kunt er meerdere seizoenen mee vullen. Ik zie incompetentie en verouderde machtsstructuren en -systemen. Zwakke mensen, allemaal carrièrematig omhoog gedwarreld totdat ze vastliepen op een plek waar ze geen promotie konden bewerkstelligen. Met "Kikkers in de kruiwagen houden", een gladde politiek-correcte babbel en meer van dat soort vaardigheden kom je een heel eind. Op de winkel passen gaat dan prima. Until the shit hits the fan.
I am trying to come up with a story (actually everything can still be verified) with a timeline that develops in real time, a branching chain reaction with dynamically appearing opportunities and threats that various power blocks respond to. Then you cannot speak of 'planning' and therefore not of 'plandemic'. Whether you can call it a 'conspiracy' depends on your definition of that word. A lot of bonds have been forged, that's for sure.
Well, that's why there was an immediate test. That is why we spoke to the media in advance. That's why the vaccines were ready so quickly. Therefore, a court order could be reversed the same day. That is why the data remains obscure and every effort is made to plausibilize the data. That is why fundamental rights have been violated. Contradiction is silenced. Excess mortality is ironed out or attributed to still-covid. Errors are condoned by the PR officials at the national media. Everyone does it in their pants in The Hague. Van Dissel knew it, OMT probably also, De Jonge knew nothing about that lableak but everything about the only way out, Rutte just happened to laugh out loud when it was told, so he probably doesn't have an active memory of it.
That is why we are still not allowed to know anything about how it went wrong and we invent our own narrative. The longer it takes, the smaller the corner where everyone paints. Disastrous.
Oh ja, waar was die 5 miljard ook weer heen gegaan? Ah joh, zeg "Sywert" en niemand die het er nog over heeft. GGD-wantoestanden? Roep "Forum!", dan zijn we daar ook mee klaar.
Maybe not a conspiracy but The Biggest Cover-up in History.
P.S.: Sign the petition against the corona pass. Started last night, now over 100,000 signatures. Link:

There could be another storyline, which is the enormous money flows and the imminent (?) collapse of the financial fiat system. September 2019 initially produced a new banking crisis that announced itself with a sharp rise in interest rates on the repo market. The European central bank immediately switches the money press to full speed, which has caused today's mega inflation. All banks can get rid of their loss-making loans with the ECB and since then have tens of printed billions more on their balance sheets. The EU itself has also started borrowing (the Eurobonds) and those hundreds of billions go everywhere, without democratic control. Everything silently under the flag of 'Corona'.
I'll definitely take it with me. I don't know if there has been direct pressure from that angle, but even there they have used crisis chaos as an excuse to move their problems forward instead of solving them.
Regulators should put a stop to "solutions" that shift short-term problems to future generations.
Similar story at the US Fed, explained here (rather technically):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rDtVABEzcy4
By the way, here is a follow-up to this story, including the role of Blackrock:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_RA23LDiuA
If there is a need for a less technical explanation, please respond here, then I will make for a more accessible story
BioNTech's 2019 annual report was not published until May 2020.
https://investors.biontech.de/financials/annual-reports-ger/
page 197
Jahresabschluss
Der vom Vorstand am 14. May 2020 aufgestellte
Jahresabschluss für das Geschäftsjahr 2019, der
am 14. May 2020 aufgestellte Konzernabschluss
2019 sowie der Lagebericht und der Konzernlage-
message haben allen Mitgliedern des Aufsichtsrats
foreclosed.
Whatever else you may think of vector vaccines (time will tell, if we're lucky). .. they had been developing for years because of cancer. Perhaps opportunism rather than conspiracy?
Thanks for all the much appreciated articles.
Even if it was published in 2022: in 2019 work has been done on Covid-19 vaccines, that is what it says and that is quite specific, especially if jet pre-clinical research has already been completed. Then you must already have the corresponding virus. It is not "general mRNA research". Or it was and the annual report was falsified so that they could a) stretch the far too short development period a bit and b) declare everything that was even remotely related to the governments in one fell swoop.
For cancer, mRNA vaccines seem to be better suited because they first whirl around the body before they actually get to work and cause inflammation and other immune reactions in the body's own cells. That could mean a promise for metastases, because it concerns the body's own cells in different places in the body.
But from what I have heard from a doctor: even there there is still too much collateral damage, it is only applied to hopeless patients. A "hope of blessing" treatment.
Thought he had read something strange, in which the USA would have wanted to sue Pfizer & Moderna, among others, on the basis of unfinished studies and incomplete information in order to provide an earlier admission and approval. From then on, people started to focus on wanting to vaccinate toddlers as well, so that they can get away with it in this way, because it would fall under a different heading??? It was not entirely clear to me and thought it was a strange story, can't find the article anymore, but had hoped that it would say something to 😉 you anyway
Don't understand why you could not claim compensation on the basis of given misleading information (falls under the door-to-door law) and manipulation by imposed sanctions (such as loss of work otherwise) that led to taking this vaccine, causing serious side effects and deterioration of health due to the vaccinations?!
The QR code is nothing new that has existed since 1994 and is widely used by companies and for products, was already known that this would ever appear on our passport, it has only now been misused for booster sales to bring about a social extortion.
I don't think the USA wants to sue pharma. The USA itself is at risk of claims due to the vaccination compulsion/obligation. Pharmaceutical companies want to be protected against all claims, read what lawyer Robert Kennedy Jr. says about this: https://yournews.com/2021/12/29/2272966/robert-f-kennedy-jr-vaccines-that-are-recommended-for-children/
All kinds of norms and rules apparently lapse when it comes to vaccinations. For example, I have never heard the Advertising Code Committee complain about promotional "product placing" of vaccines in talk shows, newsreels, current affairs programs, you name it.
Thank you for the answer with the provided information, thought it was already a strange story.. yet it remains special that one can seemingly circumvent the law so easily and no one wants /dares to make a comment?!
It is high time that independent checks are carried out on companies, products and, among other things, managers, who are often simply employed in the Netherlands by the person who has to check them; that is why this type of practice is more commonplace than an exception. In addition, independent scientific research must play an important role in decision-making if it is shown that they are incorrect.
In addition, it is scandalous that many managers who leave due to damage caused / own failure with a forced dismissal and a fat rot bonus in hand, can take a seat in the next position, without any account being taken?!.. such a person should be suspended and relieved of responsible positions, it seems to me.
As for "independent scientific research": that has to do with "Guidelines for Scientific Integrity", see https://virusvaria.nl/knaw/ There are holes to be shot in there. Or somehow it doesn't seem to really interest anyone.
Regarding your other objections: agree. My esteemed companions of the Eucalyptic Society often write critically about this. See:
https://eucalyptischgenootschap.nl/waarom-wordt-de-fda-bijna-voor-de-helft-gefinancierd-door-bedrijven-die-het-controleert/
Nice to know that there are still a few attentive / critical, although something really needs to change in this, this can no longer be done.