Heart patients who are checked every six months have a greatly increased risk of sudden heart problems (ACS, acute coronary syndrome) after vaccination. This is measured with the validated PULS test, which provides a risk estimate of having a heart attack within 5 years. This is how cardiologists monitor their patients. This ACS risk was 11% on average and is now 25% in vaccinated people. The effect will last for at least 2.5 months, when the warning report was submitted and posted on Circulation, the website of The American Heart Association. (ahajournals.org). A respected medical journal with peer-reviewed publications.
It is conceivable that non-patients will also show a worsening of the risk. Hearts that are still growing, how do they react? Children, young people? Does that deterioration also double there or does there also add a 14% risk – you would think that would have to be investigated. In the meantime, the vaccination campaign is being stepped up a notch and children are in the crosshairs of the vaccination junta.
Major effects on mortality and excess mortality
If the above report is even half true, we are going to see a wave of heart problems and other blood-related conditions. Maybe we're already in there; Those dates have not been released. It could explain part of the excess mortality.
Now, a single warning doesn't have to be a reason to panic. Of course: the underlying mechanism is known, and we have also been warned about. We are now waiting for confirmations or multiple signals that it is actually happening, because it was never properly researched before this emergency vaccine was rolled out. "We have to learn from this," said Pfizer physician visitor Marc Kaptein. The following video is all the more worrying.
Physicians fear for research budget
Dr. Aseem Malhotra (an insider, see video) says that at least 1 other research group endorses this cautionary message. They have had their own meetings about it. They also wanted to warn but did not dare to publish their findings because their research budget could be jeopardized.
Can a trade-off be criminal?
It is reasonable that health institutes want to protect people over 80 against a flu virus that is dangerous for people over 80 at the expense of an increased heart risk. Every surviving flu season is one. But the fact that children are made into (possibly) lifelong heart patients is not even worth considering. Children have nothing to fear from the virus. Their vaccination status adds nothing to protecting the community, and even if it were, it is ethically and morally reprehensible to do so to them.
Every victim is blood on the hands of anyone who fails to defend against such a decision. After all, you know in advance that children will die. Can that be called manslaughter or infanticide? Is anyone responsible? Pfizer: "The governments have put pressure on us to step back from our responsibility." Cabinet: "We followed the knowledge of our advisors and were also outgoing." OMT: "We only gave advice". House of Representatives: "We voted very democratically with the majority."
If it is decided to inject young people, even without these kinds of side effects having been properly studied, then that is a deliberate choice to sacrifice children and young people in order to save the elderly. Or if I speak for myself: we, the elderly, are going to sacrifice children to save ourselves. I think that is a scandal. Then we are ultimately that baby-blood-drinking elite who want eternal life, as it is portrayed by conspiracy theorists. OMT members: resign if things go that way. You don't want this on your conscience...
Front News
Time for some anecdotal support, as the broadcasters are so happy to give. It doesn't mean anything else, but it still sets the tone nicely.
What's going on in Scotland?
Summer in Scotland: 25% more heart attacks
The Times reports of an unexplained increase in potentially fatal heart attacks, caused by blocked blood supply from blood clot-clogged arteries. It is still being investigated how this could have come about so suddenly.
Something completely different: infant mortality in Scotland
Newborn mortality, you shouldn't think about it for too long. The average in Scotland was 2.1 per 1,000 births. In September, it suddenly more than doubled. Is it an accidental outlier or is it here to stay? We don't know. A link with Covid-19 is hinted at.
It could be an accidental spike. But then we don't have to look for a connection with Covid-19 either. What's more: Covid has been with us for two years. A human pregnancy lasts about nine months. I am curious to know why we only see this phenomenon occur after two years.
Has anything else happened in the last 9 months that could have an impact? Surely the medical community should jump on top of that. Reproductive organs have already been mentioned as possible targets of the Spike proteins, so this doesn't really come out of the blue.
That was a lot of Scotland. That may have to do with the transparent reporting there. The Dutch-language media are also taking an advance, but in a different way. Two birds with one stone: excess mortality is attributable to climate change.
Oxford professor Sunetra Gupta on the vaccines
"Vaccinating children is not acceptable and not logical."
She argues that children have no danger to fear from covid and that vaccines do not work against the spread of the virus. Vaccinating children is not rational.
Closer to home
We see this more and more clearly around us, in spite of the lagging reports from the RIVM. At least in Belgium, the vaccines do not work against infection and even less well than hoped against hospitalization. All anecdotal, of course.
"The vast majority of the patients we are now admitting have been vaccinated"
Jo Leysen (AZ Turnhout)
"The patients we now have in the ICU because of Covid are actually all vaccinated"
Kristiaan Deckers (Head Physician – GZA)
Scientific objections to childhood vaccination
A clear study that denounces the dangerous nonsense of childhood vaccination against Covid named by Gupta scientifically substantiated.
Where are we going...
The vaccination craze is taking on legendary proportions. While new variants are being squeezed out of the mutations by the vaccinations, the vaccination obligation is getting closer. The compulsion is already there.
If even children are now being violated, a new line is being crossed. Of course, you can make children believe that they need to be vaccinated. A predator also gets children in his back seat. These are practices that should not be considered for a moment by a government. Their moral compass is completely lost.
